| ABSTRACT
The
term natural resistance refers to the capacity of living organisms to withstand
injury caused by physical, chemical and biological agents that may be present
in the external or internal environment. This protection is mediated
by the natural, or innate, immune system, a multi-factorial and polyspecific
defence system. Evolutionarily preserved germ-line receptors mediate the
activation of natural immune cells that recognize genetically preserved,
cross-reactive homologous epitopes (homotopes) in micro-organisms, cancer
cells, virus-infected cells and distressed cells. In general, protection
is based on balancing the defence mechanisms of the organism with the damaging
effects of harmful agents. This defence comprises epithelial, secretory
and endogenous mechanisms in addition to the cellular and humoural components
of the natural immune system. In recent years, a continuing surge of exploration
and discussion has helped to crystallize our appreciation of the molecular
mechanisms of this innate system, their basis in evolution, physiological
pathological and behavioural significance and their regulation, in particular
their intimate connection with the neuroendocrine system. In
higher animals natural immune mechanisms are boosted profoundly during
acute febrile illness leading to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines,
IL-1, TNF-alpha and IL-6, which in turn activate the neuroimmune regulatory
network. The HPA axis and the sympathetic nervous system is activated
and catabolism prevails. IL-6, glucocorticoids and cathecolamines induce
the production of acute phase proteins permitting a rapid activation of
phagocytic and cytotoxic mechanisms under the command of natural antibodies
and other recognition molecules (e.g. C-reactive protein, endotoxin binding
and mannose binding proteins). The acute phase response is a highly co-ordinated
emergency defence reaction, which relies on the interaction of neuroendocrine,
immune and metabolic mechanisms in the interest of maximum host defence
during emergency situations, such as sepsis. In most cases febrile
illness leads to healing and recovery, which attests to the effectiveness
of the natural immune system and excites the desire for the benefits which
should accrue from mastering the manipulation of this system.
1. INTRODUCTION
Innate
or natural immunity has had a long and exciting past of which we are increasingly
being made aware. The origins of the natural immune system are clearly
buried in the evolutionary struggle for life. All living organisms, whether
eucariotic, procariotic, unicellular or multicellular, from the lowest
evolutionary stage right to the top, must have adequate defences against
infections and other environmental threats. There is rapidly increasing
knowledge of the various invertebrate defence systems, all of which depend
on genetically stable, hard-wired innate mechanisms, or “natural” immune
mechanisms, as they most frequently are called. It is also becoming clear
that many, if not all of the natural defence molecules, which are present
in vertebrates are also represented in lower animals. Most of the mechanisms
involved are redundant and mutipotent, aimed at highly conserved, cross-reactive
homologous epitopes, or homotopes for short. Homotopes are present on the
targets of the natural defence system which may be microbes, infected
- and cancer cells, as well as on other external and internal targets,
as presented in this volume [1-3].
The
evolutionary connection of our natural immune system to that of lower animals
is truly fascinating. For instance, bacteria are known to express heat
shock proteins, which must serve their survival under difficult environmental
circumstances. In higher animals and man, heat shock proteins have similar
functions and are intimately associated with steroid hormone receptors.
Steroid hormones play important roles in the stress response [4,5]. Fungi
make antibiotic substances, which miraculously work well in higher animals
and man to fight bacterial infections. Antibiotics may be regarded to be
analogous to defensins, and other antimicrobial molecules in our natural
immune arsenal. Ciliates, which are the most primitive unicellular animals,
are phagocytic organisms. Do they eat, digest and, therefore, destroy their
microbial enemies? We know little about this, but our own phagocytic cells
are certainly capable of eating away our enemies and much more.
Multicellular
plants, as well as animals, must possess an effective system for organization
and adequate defence mechanisms in order to survive and withstand environmental
challenges and infectious agents. We share adhesion molecules with plants
as attested by the stimulatory effect of plant lectins, such as phytohemagglutinine
and concanavalin-A, on lymphocytes [6]. The existence of plant derived
hormones, contraceptives and many remedies testifies further for our physiological
and pathophysiological ties with the plant kingdom.
One
striking conclusion, which is apparent from this book, is that the natural
immune system serves well and protects most species of the animal kingdom
with its enormous variety of defence mechanisms, whereas adaptive immunity
exists only in a small minority of animals. If most species rely on innate
mechanisms and survive well and prosper, this must speak forcefully for
the enormous potency and versatility of this system. It is also clear that
cytokines predate the adaptive immune system and so do neuropeptides predate
the development of the central nervous system (CNS). Neuroimmune interactions
also existed prior to the development of the central nervous system [7].
It is also regarding the innate system, as it is for the adaptive system,
that immune mechanisms play an important role in normal physiology and
pathology [8-10].
Today
immunological host defence may be categorised into three major constituents:
(a) species-specific resistance, (b) natural immunity and (c) the adaptive
immune response. Species-specific resistance depends on factors defined
by evolution. For instance, pathogens are capable of causing disease in
some species whereas others remain refractory [11]. In contrast, natural
immunity is subject to changes according to the environment of the individual
and represent a long-recognized, important but largely unresolved challenge
in medicine. Much more is known about the adaptive immune response which
exerts exquisite specificities towards antigenic determinants or epitopes
of infectious agents and of other antigens. This has been the overwhelming
subject of interest in modern immunology, with specificity the dominating
concept in the study of immunity, so that we have learned much about the
adaptive immune system [12]. Specific responses are detected more easily
and the results may be presented in a quantitative form which offers to
the scientist a more reasonable chance for success. It has been much more
difficult to study natural immunity in spite of the fact that many of the
cellular and immune factors that are involved in this system have long
been recognized [13].
One
may suggest without hesitation that the problem of natural immunity is
one of the most important challenges in modern medicine. It is apparent
that immune function, including natural immunity, is influenced by numerous
medical interventions and other factors that include nutrition, surgical
procedures, various forms of injury, ionizing radiation, chemotherapeutic
and immunosuppressive drugs, environmental pollution and harmful lifestyle
(incorrect nutrition, alcoholism, smoking, drug abuse, lack of exercise,
etc.). These factors may decrease natural immunity, which could lead to
disease or even death caused by facultative pathogenic organisms that are
harmless to healthy individuals.
The
AIDS epidemic has stimulated interest in natural immunity. It became apparent
that AIDS patients died of secondary infections as a rule and these were
due to the profound immunosuppression caused by HIV. Similar observations
were made in cancer patients treated by chemotherapeutic agents and ionizing
radiation, which suppress immune host defences. This fact emphasized the
importance of natural immunity and the need for immunological rehabilitation
and stimulation in such patients. It also became clear to immunologists
that natural immunity was much more significant than previously recognized and that it deserved much more attention.
The
phenomenon of natural resistance plays an important role in biology by
allowing for the selection of individuals that are most resistant to disease.
In our time, natural selection is curbed by human intervention. This demands
further attention to the enhancement of immune mechanisms, which make it
possible to save individuals who would have succumbed to disease in earlier
times.
Clearly,
we are just beginning to recognize the enormous complexity, efficiency
and importance of this system in the Biology of animals and man and there
is a lot to be clarified for a thorough understanding of natural immunity.
The rationale for the evolution of this system is the focus of animated
discussion and conjecture.
2.
HISTORY: IMMUNE DEFENCE VERSUS SELF-ORGANIZATION
The
concept of resistance to disease must have evolved simultaneously with
the recognition of health and disease during prehistoric times. A decrease
in resistance resulted in disease, which occurred in the weak and infirm
as a rule. In spite of the common occurrence of disease throughout history,
the underlying mechanisms remained unexplained for millennia. The scientists
and physicians of ancient times were not able to define adequately the
concept of resistance. Before the discovery of microbes, a number of factors
(e.g. extreme cold or hot weather, starvation and environmental factors)
were linked with the occurrence of certain infectious disease outbreaks
or epidemics, often as a consequence of wars.
Experimentally
Pasteur made the first observations with regard to the association of chicken
cholera and abrupt changes in the weather. Robert Koch studied anthrax
infection of chickens after forcing them to swim in cold water. These experiments
indicated that environmental factors have an influence on resistance to
disease. Nevertheless the exact definition of resistance was not put forward
till our time. The situation is somewhat similar to the one described by
János in the Book of “Phenomena”: ‘two people sat on the roof, one
was taken, the other was left behind’. In other words, it was generally recognized
that during epidemics in a human or animal population some individuals
always remained healthy. This occurred even when the majority of the population
succumbed to disease. The ability of certain individuals to face deadly
diseases was defined as resistance. No further distinctions were made in
this respect. The term immunity was also used to describe the resistance
of an organism against infectious disease [13].
2.1.
Inflammation and phagocytosis
While
Cornelius Celsus (30BC-AD50) has been attributed with the first description
of inflammation [14], in thinking about the development of our current
understanding of natural immunity, the formative work of Metchnikoff is
often cited, with thanks to Alfred Tauber for keeping the spotlight on
Metchnikoff [ 15-18]. As described by Tauber, Chernyak and Podolsky
[rev in 16,19], Metchnikoff's observation of the process of inflammation
around thorns in starfish larvae led him to propose the "phagocyte as the
amoeboid mediator of cellular immunity" in an expansion of the phagocyte
aboriginal function of "eating to feed" to "eating to defend". This
concept provided a basis for the investigation of cellular immunity and
a counterpoint of debate for the subsequently developed (immunochemically focused) school of humoural immunity [17]. Further, according to
his interpretation of Darwinism, Metchnikoff postulated a fundamentally
disharmonious concept of the living organism, in contrast with the view
of individual health at the time, a condition of harmony [19]. Metchnikoff
considered that "embryological development proceeds with cell lineages
that are potentially in competition", disharmonious and required "harmonizers",
phagocytes, to decide which cells would survive [quoted as in 19].
Thus, phagocytes actively defined what would later be referred to as immune
"self". One could imagine that the generation of spontaneous mutations
could act as a disharmonizing process. Metchnikoff also argued that phagocytes
would continue to actively define an organism in the adult state and that
phagocytes would also defend the host (all in the interest of survival
!). The latter led to his Bacillus bulgarus therapy, to replace the
toxic flora of the large intestine with exogenous “friendly" microbes,
a for-runner of current-day probiotics and driver of the yogurt industry
[19].
2.2.
Self /non-self: early days and ancient times
In
the history of the immune "self" controversy outlined by Tauber [18], the
idea that the immune system distinguished between self and non-self was
implicit in Metchnikoff's phagocytosis theory, and was formally expressed
when Burnet introduced the ideas of self, and self-non-self discrimination
leading to his proposal of the clonal selection theory in 1959 [20].
This shifted the arbitration of self/non-self from phagocytes to the clonally
selected T and B lymphocytes of the adaptive immune response. Jerne's
(idiotypic) network theory of the immune system published in the early
1970's, proposed a highly integrated and self-sensing lymphocyte system
[21]. The system knows only itself and perturbation of the system is required
for activation. While in the Burnet model, defense of self was the
foundation of immune reactivity, Jerne's self-sensing network challenged
the concept of immune "self" and expanded the role of the immune system
to physiological functions.
Figure
1. A partially cross-sectioned asconoid sponge [adapted from Ref. 22]
As
is obvious from the above overview, immunologists have thought for a long
time that self-recognition was a feature exclusive to the immune system.
However, zoologists have long established that self-recognition was easily
demonstrable in the most primitive multi-cellular animals, sponges (Fig
1). Sponges control their morphogenesis, cell proliferation and differentiation.
They preserve their species characteristics and have immune defences as
well. They are capable of rejecting grafts from other species of sponges.
Phagocytic cells provide their immune defence. Sponges were disintegrated
by passing them through a screen. When brought together under proper conditions,
the cells re-aggregated with cells from the same species, but not with
cells from other species, so as to form functional sponge units, which
could vary in size but with the maintenance of function. Clearly, these
seemingly loosely aggregated cells behave as a highly coordinated morphogenic
regulatory system. Sponge cells will grow and differentiate into functional
cells according to their topographical localization [22]. Similar observations
were made in higher animals. Cells from different anlages of the amphibian
embryo were mixed and they were able to sort out into a pattern that resembled
the initial organization of embryonic tissue. Such aggregation experiments
were also performed with embryonic cells from birds or mammals. Cell
adhesion molecules present in embryonic tissue mediate such re-aggregation
and play a key role in morphogenesis [23,24].
Embryonic
morphogenesis is regulated by cell-to-cell contact and by diffusible mediators.
Adhesion molecules are non-diffusible, hence they are capable of signalling single cells very specifically. It is very clear from embryonic development
and from antigen-induced lymphocyte proliferation that adhesion signals
are dominant over growth factor signalling. This is an obligate requirement
for morphogenesis, which is based on the positional relationship of cells/tissues
to each other. Adherence signals determine, according to the local tissue/organ
requirements, whether or not the cell is going to divide, differentiate
and take up a function, or simply be on standby (survive), or perhaps be
committed to the pathway of programmed cell death (apoptosis). Concentration
gradients of tissue hormones and cytokines are important for morphogenesis
during embryonic development [6]. This means that only certain cells
will divide at any given time, while others will go into differentiation
and take up the appropriate function according to their location in the
body, or be on standby (stem cells, as well as differentiated cells) or
may even be eliminated. Therefore, the systemic growth stimulus is modified
according to the local needs, so that the morphological and functional
integrity of the organism is maintained at all times. Growth hormone
(GH) is well recognized as a hormone capable of stimulating the proportional
growth of all tissues and organs. This dominance of local regulatory
mechanisms over the systemic GH signal assures the development of a fully
functional animal or human being.
Injured
nerve cells in the CNS can be re-induced to grow axons and establish functional
connections if exposed to non-neural elements of the peripheral nervous
system [25]. This finding indicates that in adult tissues that lost their
capacity to grow, stromal adherence signals are capable of inducing growth
and regeneration.
Plants
show a remarkable morphological and functional differentiation. Some
proteins extracted from plants and collectively named lectins [26,27] activate
animal cells, especially lymphoid cells for proliferation and function,
including immunoglobulin secretion, cytotoxicity, helper or suppressor
activity. Therefore, plant lectins function as regulatory molecules
on animal cells and probably fulfill similar functions in the plants as
well. Animal tissues also contain lectin-like adhesion molecules [27].
The restrictive power of cell-to-cell signaling is also fundamental to
the adaptive immune response. Clearly, an antigen specific T lymphocyte
clone must not proliferate unless it is triggered by the specific antigenic
epitope in the context of self-MHC molecules. Without this restriction
antigen-specific adaptive immune reactions would not be possible.
Furthermore, MHC recognition by suppressor T lymphocytes and inhibitory
receptors in natural killer and other cells serve as safeguards against
the killing of normal non-infected and non-cancerous cells [28].
Figure
2. Hypothetical regulatory circuits of primitive animals without the presence
of the neuroendocrine system.
1. Autocrine/paracrine secretion of competence (growth) factor. Competence
is proposed to be a prerequisite of regulation by adhesion molecules and
cytokines.
2.
Adhesion molecules regulate the growth stimulatory signal according to
the local requirements.
3.
Cytokines complete the cell cycle. Some cytokines are of distant origin,
which create gradients that are essential for axial and “head-tail” differentiation.
Sponges already show such morphological differentiation.
These
facts indicate that adhesion molecules and locally active soluble mediators
(cytokines) are required for organogenesis. It is likely that the same
mediators are needed for the re-assembly of sponge cells after disintegration.
Sponges exhibit a definite axis as vertebrates do, and it is also possible
to define an imaginary head-tail orientation. There is no nervous system
or endocrine system present in these primitive animals. On this basis,
the principal regulatory circuits that are anticipated to operate in sponges
and in similar primitive animals are shown in (Fig. 2). During
evolution the neuroendocrine system has been superimposed on this basic
regulatory circuit, which reached its highest organization in man.
So the situation has changed to the extent that the neuroendocrine system
regulates the potential for growth and function (competence) in higher
animals, whereas adhesion molecules and cytokines have the power to regulate
competence locally according to the requirements in the various tissues
and organs. Immune reactions, including natural immunity, are regulated
according to this principle (Fig. 3). It is remarkable that in
emergency situations (e.g. sepsis) the neuroimmune regulatory network is
capable of selectively enhancing natural immune mechanisms, which provide
instantaneous protection to the host, and at the same time to suppress
the adaptive arm of the immune response, which is not capable of effective
host defence under these conditions. This phenomenon has been coined as
immunoconversion [1-3].

Figure
3. The neuroimmune regulatory circuit.
During
evolution the neuroendocrine system has been super-imposed onto the basic
regulatory circuit outlined above. The CNS, via the pituitary gland now
controls systemically the competence signal for all organs and tissues
that amounts to effective growth control of the organism. Adhesion molecules
and cytokines remain in control of the local (e.g. positional) regulation
of the systemic competence signal. The target organs/tissues provide feedback
signals to the neuroendocrine system via innervation and by soluble mediators,
such as hormones and cytokines. The neuroimmune regulatory circuitry is
fundamental for the development and function of higher animals for their
entire life cycle. It exerts physiological regulation and also fundamental
to host defence, including regeneration and healing.
Clearly,
self recognition and self-non-self discrimination has been a prerequisite
of the evolution for multi-cellular organisms and thus its development
predates the development of the immune system in higher animals. The acceptance
of self and rejection of non- self has been the rule right from the beginning
for the phylogenesis of the multi-cellular animals and plants.
2.3.
More mediators: the nude mutation
Beyond
the abundant evidence for phagocytic cells, our understanding of the large
number and variety of mediators contributing to the natural immune response
was dramatically advanced by the discovery of nude mice. Mice bearing
the nude mutation have a poorly developed thymus and lack of an effective
T cell-mediated immune system. Yet, such mice did not develop an increased
incidence of spontaneous tumours. This provided a strong impetus for the
investigation of immune responses other than the thymus-dependent adaptive
immunity [rev in 29]. This lead to a surge in research by many laboratories
on the newly identified natural killer (NK) cells, which did not require
previous exposure of the host to antigen, and exhibited instantaneous cytotoxicity
towards tumour cells [30-32]. To a lesser extent observations of
'natural antibody' activity against tumours and apparently multi-specific,
autoreactive antibodies from normal individuals also received (some) attention.
The nature of immune "self" became more complicated with the identification
of such polyspecific and autoreactive NAb and with the demonstration of
NK sensing MHC class I as “self” that delivers an inhibitory signals and
that
'missing
self' leads to activation [33].
More
recently, advances in cytokine research have allowed the study of dendritric
cells, the major antigen presenting cell (APC) for naive T cell activation.
This supported the search for the mechanism of the adjuvant effect, Janeway's
'immunologist's dirty little secret', needed to produce a vigorous adaptive
immune response against a peptide antigen presented by MHC to TCRs.
Investigations initiated by Janeway and Medzhitov [34], led to the pivotal
finding that an array of Toll-like receptors on APC's could recognize different
components on bacteria activating DC's to provide the needed costimulatory
second signals for T lymphocyte activation. These discoveries brought the
innate immune system to attention, but it was chiefly framed as a supporter
for the adaptive immune response.
2.4.
An integrated system with expanded functions
Increasingly,
investigators have viewed the immune system as a highly complex and integrated
system, which communicates with the body in which it resides and self,
non-self discrimination is less the issue, rather action is determined
by the context of the interaction. Tauber [18], considers that the
question of 'context' has been interpreted narrowly by some as being established
at birth or shortly after, while for others (including Cohen, Coutinho,
Grossman and Matzinger) the context is ever changing. The search
to understand activation has focused increasingly on, 1) the nature of
signals, which are ancillary to antigen recognition in the adaptive immune
response, 2) the functional structure of the immune system in which they
operate and 3) the relationships between the clonally selected T and B
lymphocytes of the adaptive response and the mediators of the evolutionarily
ancient innate immune response. Recognition of phylogenetic and functional
relationships between the innate and adaptive immune systems has led to
the concept of a more integrated immune system with a wider scope of function.
Matzinger in particular, in defining the context of activation as "danger"
rather than the discrimination between self and non-self, assigned the
decision-making role for activation to the phagocytic APC. This proposal
was supported by her observation that necrotic but not healthy or apoptotic
cells released factors which could activate dendritic cells in vitro [35].
2.5.
LPS at the core of innate immune research
The
recently reviewed [36] long history of endotoxin study, provides a continuous
thread (a fuse really) that starts before Metchnikoff with Hippocrates
and informs our current concept of innate immunity. Beutler's and
Rietschel's story of innate immune sensing focusing on microbial 'endotoxin'
which in time became synonymous with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) a protein-free
product from Gram-negative bacteria, cites three major milestones in the
quest to understand how microbes create disease: the identification of
endotoxin as a definable chemical species, the identification of soluble,
host-derived mediators of toxicity (e.g., tumour necrosis factor, TNF)
coupled with the idea that toxicity and protection were not readily separable,
and recently the identification of the LPS receptor itself, providing evidence
that many microbial toxins share mechanisms of action similar to endotoxin.
Additional
bacterial components including some from Gram-positive bacteria exhibit
endotoxin-like biological effects in mammals among them lipopeptides, lipoteichoic
acid double-stranded RNA and unmethylated DNA with CpG motifs, and all
are recognized by paralogous receptors [36,37].
3. EPITHELIAL,
SECRETORY AND ENDOGENOUS HOST DEFENCE 3.1.
Antimicrobial peptides
Epithelial
tissues and granulocytes express numerous antimicrobial peptides called
defensins and cathelicidins. These molecules were recognized initially
for their broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties. However, now they are
known to play a role in both the regulatory and effector arms of the innate
immune system. These peptides modulate bacterial adherence ; complement
activation ; fibrinolysis; steroid synthesis; mast cell activation;
monocyte, neutrophil, mast cell, T cell and immature dendritic cell chemoattraction;
cytokine expression; cytotoxicity; cell proliferation; angiogenesis; protease
inhibitor synthesis; keratinocyte differentiation; proteoglycan synthesis;
phagocytosis and Ca+2 mobilisation. Genes of the adaptive immune system
encoding immunoglobulins and T cell receptors undergo a series of genetic
amplifications and rearrangements. Homologous events involving genes of
the innate immune system can be seen as generating a protective diversity
promoting survival of a population or species. The mechanisms for this
“genome instability” in innate immunity genes remain to be elucidated [38].
3.2.
Endogenous cytoprotective mechanisms
Endogenous
cytoprotective mechanisms protect the mammalian host against various forms
of injury and noxious stimuli. Since these mechanisms are activated upon
encountering potentially cytotoxic conditions, Haem-oxygenase and the heat
shock response confer protection against a broad array of cytotoxic stimuli.
The activation of the anti-oxidant pathways is critical to survival in
an aerobic environment. Hypoxia inducible factor is a key transcription
factor that directs the expression of genes necessary for adaptation to
hypoxia and/or ischemia. Nitric oxide is a ubiquitous molecule that impacts
a number of biological, physiological and pathophysiological processes
[39].
3.3.
Bile acids and natural resistance
Bacterial
endotoxin is toxic, when given parenterally but is harmless upon oral administration.
In naturally occurring entero-endotoxaemic diseases (e.g. shock due to
sepsis or to other causes), endotoxin is known to absorb from the intestinal
tract. If the common bile duct of rats was chronically cannulated (bile
deprived animals) orally administered endotoxin was absorbed from the intestinal
tract and provoked shock. This absorption was prevented by sodium deoxycholate
or by natural bile. Bile acids split the endotoxin macromolecule into non-toxic
fragments. This detoxifying detergent action of bile plays a significant
role in host defence against infectious agents with a lipoprotein outer
structure (e.g. “big” viruses). This represents a physico-chemical defence
system. Bile deficiency and the consequent endotoxaemia are important components
in the pathogenesis of certain diseases, such as sepsis, intestinal syndrome
of radiation disease, hepato-renal syndrome, parvovirus infection, herpes,
psoriasis, atherosclerosis, etc. Finally, bile acids may be used for the
prevention and/or therapy of some clinical conditions such as the hepato-renal
syndrome and psoriasis [40].
4.
THE NATURAL IMMUNE SYSTEM
4.1.
Natural killer cells: history and current status
Natural
killer (NK) cells are a major component of the immune system, which play
important roles in host defences against cancer and microbial infections.
NK cells are distinct from T or B lymphocytes, with a characteristic morphology
of large granular cells, and can be readily identified by characteristic
cell surface molecules. They have the ability to recognize and rapidly
kill a wide array of tumour cells and also virus-infected normal cells.
NK cytotoxic activity can be strongly augmented by interferon, interleukin-2,
and other cytokines. NK cells are major producers of some cytokines, especially
interferon gamma [41]; they produce a neutrophil-activating factor and
upregulate polymorphonuclear leukocytes to kill Candida albicans [42].
4.2.
The reticuloendothelial system
During
the nineteenth century varied cell types, which acted in host defence by
phagocytosing foreign invaders were grouped collectively into the reticuloendothelial
system (RES). The depression or blockage of the granulopoetic activity
of this system has attracted considerable attention. Gadolinium chloride (GdCl3), depresses RES activity and selectively suppresses or eliminates
the large Kupffer cells. Kupffer cell blockade modifies the immune response,
exerts protective effects on anaphylactic and endotoxic/septic shock, and
decreases the liver-damaging effects of several hepatotoxins and ischaemic
reperfusion. Recent studies have elucidated the mechanisms by which GdCl3-induced
Kupffer cell blockade protects against a variety of hepatotoxic processes
[43].
4.3.
Effector mechanisms of natural immunity
Evolutionary
approaches to the investigation of innate immune mechanisms has shown that
monoclonal antibodies to human adhesion molecules react with earthworm,
leech and sipunculan leukocytes. Many CD markers common to vertebrate leukocytes,
especially to macrophages and natural killer cells are expressed.
In earthworms, only those leukocytes which are positive are active as killers
in cytotoxic responses, whereas larger, primarily phagocytic leukocytes
are negative. The evolution of complement can be traced from sea urchins
to
the teleosts and tetrapods, exhibiting at each level a corresponding increase
in the numbers of complement components and duplications in complement
pathways. Invertebrates and vertebrates seem to possess common signaling molecules e.g. neuropeptides. These
signaling molecules are immunomodulators
in circulating blood. In vertebrates, release occurs during stress
that triggers the hypothalamo-hypophyseal-adrenal (HPA) axis. Neuropeptides
are conserved messengers that regulate innate immune responses in invertebrates
and in humans. The evidence suggests that the cross talk between nervous
and immune systems has an ancient evolutionary origin, which is essential
to homeostasis [7].
4.4.
Natural immune activation
Multiple
recognition molecules are involved representing numerous structural families
including, several lectin families, pentraxins, leucine-rich repeats, many
members of the IgSF, integrins, scavenger receptors and the seven transmembrane
receptor family. Invading pathogens exhibit a range of different repeating
epitopes. Host molecules express a variety of receptors capable of recognising
these epitopes and act in a combinatorial manner which confers specificity
to the host response. The large number, diversity, and ancient evolutionary
origin of these receptors argues for the essential nature of their functions.
While providing a first line of defence against invading pathogens is clearly
crucial for organism survival, evidence is accumulating that these same
receptors also participate in essential physiological functions [44].
4.5.
Signaling in natural killer cells
NK
cells have the ability to recognize tumour- and virus-associated ligands.
These cells express CD16, the low-affinity Fc receptor (FcR) for IgG. NK
cells do not have a single type of receptor through which they recognize
antigens. Rather, clonal subpopulations of NK cells differ in their
expression of receptors that recognize a variety of ligands on target cells
throughout the body. NK cell binding of these ligands initiates signaling cascades within the NK cell that control its response to the target [45].
4.5
Toll-like receptors.
Macrophages
are central in orchestrating the innate immune response to infection, which
is not a trivial task: they must be able to discriminate microbes from
self, and then initiate a proper response. The discovery of the Toll-like
receptor (TLR) family of pattern-recognition receptors has provided insight
to this kind of recognition. TLRs are expressed on macrophages and
other innate immune cells, where they collaborate to read the molecular
fingerprint of different microbes and initiate inflammatory signaling pathways. The TLR family is important in infectious diseases, and there
is also evidence that they may play a role in autoimmunity and degenerative
diseases in the central nervous system [46].
5.
REGULATION OF NATURAL IMMUNITY 5.1.
Leukocyte migration
Leukocyte
migration is essential for reactions to inflammatory stimuli at various
locations in the body. However, leukocyte movement is also crucial during
non-inflammatory processes such as haematopoietic development and routine
passage through secondary lymphoid organs, which is also required for effective
antigen presentation. Immune defects occur in chemokine receptor deficient
mice. Chemokines, their receptors and adhesion molecules play a key role
in the regulation of the immune response during inflammatory and under
homeostatic conditions. Leukocyte trafficking plays a role during developmental
processes, for example in haematopoiesis and thymic maturation of T cells
and in regulatory circuits that ensure immune surveillance and communication
between the innate and adaptive components of immunity [47].
Leukocytes
utilize an active process to halt chemotaxis and switch to effector activity,
with the aid of the arrestin protein, which blocks chemotactic signaling from chemokine receptors and converts it to a signal for degranulation
[48, 49]. The discovery of chemorepulsive activity mediated by CXCR4 provides
a mechanism by which mature T cells may exit the thymus [50, 51].
5.2.
Neuroendocrine regulation of natural immunity Natural
killer (NK) cells, (gd T lymphocytes and CD5+ B lymphocytes are key effector
cells in the natural immune system. These cells utilize germ-line coded
receptors that recognize highly conserved, homologous epitopes (homotopes).
Under physiological conditions the natural immune system is regulated similarly
to the adaptive immune system: growth and lactogenic hormones (GLH), insulin-like
growth factor-I (IGF-I), insulin, leptin, some steroid (glucocorticoid
at physiological concentrations, dehydroepiandrosterone and some of its
derivatives) and thyroid hormones are stimulatory. The peptides of the
hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (CRF, AVP, ACTH,
aMSH,
bEND) exert an
immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory and anti-pyretic effect. Opioid peptides
and estradiol are immunomodulators that promote some immune activities
while inhibiting others. High (pathophysiological) levels of glucocorticoids,
progesterone and testosterone act as immunosuppressive hormones. Beta-adrenergic
agents are immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory, whereas cholinergic
agents promote immunity and inflammation. Substance P and calcitonin-gene
related peptide are pro-inflammatory and promote immunity, whereas somatostatin
is an antagonist of these neuropeptides [52]. Mild
infection or a sublethal dose of endotoxin elicits a brief elevation of
GH and PRL in the serum. Severe trauma, sepsis and shock results in the
elevation of TNF-alpha, IL-1 and IL-6 in the blood stream, the GLH-IGF-I axis
is suppressed, whereas the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis is activated.
LH, FSH, estrogens, androgens, progesterone, and thyroid hormones all decline
during infection and endotoxin shock, as a rule. Leptin, insulin, glucagon, a
-MSH, endorphin, and arginine vasopressin are increased during endotoxemia.
A “sympathetic outflow” leads to elevated blood levels of catecholamines.
Fever and catabolism prevails, whereas acute phase proteins in the liver,
cell proliferation in the bone marrow, and protein synthesis by leukocytes
are increased. This is an acute emergency reaction to save the organism
after the adaptive immune system has failed to contain and eliminate the
pathogenic agent. During sepsis and endotoxin shock, glucocorticoids potentiate
the production of acute phase proteins and regulate pro-inflammatory cytokine
production. Catecholamines also inhibit inflammatory responses and promote,
even initiate, the acute phase response. Leptin regulates energy metabolism
and it is a major stimulator of the immune system. If the acute phase reaction
fails to protect the host, shock will develop and death will follow [52].
The
acute phase response leads to immunoconversion, which involves the suppression
of the T-cell regulated adaptive immune system and the amplification of
natural immunity. Natural antibodies, C-reactive -, endotoxin binding-
and mannose binding proteins are boosted and serve as polyspecific recognition
molecules for leukocytes. The natural immune system provides the
first and the last line of host defence and its functional integrity and
massive activation is largely dependent on the neuroendocrine system [52].
5.3.
Natural immunity - Effect of exercise
Natural
immunity is influenced by pharmacological agents, the environment, exercise
and diet. Exercise induces increased circulating levels of a number
of cytokines, especially IL-6, which is produced locally in contracting
skeletal muscles and accounts for the arterial IL-6 concentration. In turn,
IL-6 stimulates the production of a number of anti-inflammatory cytokines
such as IL-1ra and IL-10 and also works in a hormone-like fashion.
IL-6 also stimulates cortisol production and in the recovery phase of heavy
exertion, a cortisol-induced shift in leukocyte subsets is seen.
The dominant features in the post-exercise period are lymphopenia, neutrophilia
and a markedly suppressed natural killer cell activity. In addition secretory
IgA is inhibited [53].
Many
clinical physical stressors (e.g., surgery, trauma, burn, sepsis) and environmental
factors such as hyperthermia and hypoxia induce hormonal and immunological
responses that have similarities to the cellular response to exercise [54].
Training at an intense level over many years can result in a chronic suppression
of salivary immunoglobulin levels. The degree of immune suppression
and the recovery rates after exercise are associated with the intensity
of exercise and the duration or volume of the training [55]. The effect
of acute hypoxia on lymphocytes resembles the effect of exercise [56].
The
production of IL-6 from working muscles is further enhanced if muscle glycogen
content is low. Carbohydrate intake during exercise attenuates the
IL-6 production and consequently exercise-induced cortisol production and
fluctuations in NK cells and neutrophils. A major new finding is that exercise-induced
immune changes are not a secondary phenomenon to exercise-induced hormonal
changes. Rather, muscle contractions induce the release of IL-6. By producing
IL-6, muscle fibers are directly involved in exercise-induced immune changes,
and exercise-induced cortisol changes can be viewed as a secondary phenomenon,
which in turn leads to altered leukocyte subset composition. As IL-6
works as an energy sensor, it is also clear that dietary factors such as
carbohydrate, may influence the immune response to exercise. It is
noteworthy, that a cytokine, previously known as a component of the natural
immune defence, should now also be considered as an important player in
metabolism [53].
5.4. Enhancement of natural immunity
Endotoxin
injections produce endotoxin tolerance and elevate natural resistance.
However, such injections may have serious side effects, such as high fever,
hypotension and abortion. For this reason LPS injections are not suitable
for the enhancement of natural immune mechanisms in endotoxin-sensitive
mammalian species. Various techniques have been used (physical, chemical,
etc.) for the detoxification of endotoxins while the beneficial effects
were maintained. One of the best detoxification techniques is treatment
with ionizing radiation. The irradiation of LPS with 60Co (100-200 kGy)
decreased its toxicity. Such radiodetoxified endotoxin (RD-LPS) preparations
showed decreased toxicity, whereas the beneficial effects were preserved
(150 kGy:TOLERIN®). Irradiation causes marked chemical alteration in LPS,
such as the decrease of glucosamine, KDO and fatty acids. A single parenteral
injection of TOLERIN® is capable of preventing various shock syndromes
in experimental animals. Unlike endotoxin, TOLERIN has barely any hypotensive
effect and pretreatment with this preparation can prevent practically all
the haemodynamic changes induced by LPS. LPS plays an important role in
the pathogenesis of the intestinal syndrome of radiation disease, which
may be prevented by up to 70% in rats with RD-LPS pretreatment. TOLERIN
retains the adjuvant activity of LPS and it is a good adjuvant for inactivated
virus vaccines. TOLERIN can also evoke the regeneration of the immune system
in irradiated animals. The decrease of natural immunity in immunodeficient
or immunosuppressed patients is the most important cause of opportunistic
infections that may lead to sepsis, endotoxaemia, pneumonia and so on.
Boosting of natural resistance and the induction of endotoxin tolerance
are important in such patients. RD-LPS could produce significant proliferation
of lymphoid cells in germ-free animals, which are immunodeficient. Many
other beneficial effects are exerted by RD-LPS preparations, such as the
activation of macrophages and of the reticuloendothelial system, antitumour
activity, etc. On the basis of these favourable experimental results, TOLERIN
was tested on 350 surgical patients suffering from gastrointestinal tumours,
on patients suffering from AIDS and on cancer patients treated with CYSPLATINc.
TOLERIN treatment prevented sepsis and activated bone marrow function in
these patients [57]. 6.
PHYSIOLOGICAL, PATHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL SIGNIFICANCE 6.1.
Physiological activities of the natural immune system
Recent
research has revealed the extensive underlying physiological role of the
innate immune system in the development and homeostasis of the organism.
The impact on development is evident during embryogenesis and also during
normal cyclical changes in reproductive tissues in the adult. Mediators
of the innate immune system are essential for normal tissue renewal and
healing, regeneration, air breathing, cell signaling and cancer control.
Natural immunity contributes to the normal physiology of the organism in
many and diverse ways arguing for an evolutionary selection centered on
self-organization for survival [8].
6.2. Pathophysiological relevance
The
natural immune response is a pre-programmed, poly-specific first line of
defence that is primarily responsible for eliminating or containing pathogens
at the site of entrance into the host. This evolutionary conserved system
was described first in cells of the immune system. However, it became apparent
this form of immune potential exists in various tissues, where its activation
plays a significant role in host defence, autoimmunity, inflammatory disease
and pathogenesis of sepsis-induced multiorgan dysfunction. It is possible
that natural immunity plays a role in the aging process, and in tumour
immunosurveillance [9].
6.3.
Behavioural mechanisms in host defence
Behavioural
strategies assist organisms to defend themselves against pathogens.
Reflexive behaviours, like coughing and vomiting, can be instrumental in
expelling pathogens from the body. The avoidance of excrement is an important
strategy for minimizing contact with pathogens. Learned food aversions
and the avoidance of stimuli previously associated with illness minimize
contact with pathogens. Behavioural changes can be induced by immune activation,
and it has been argued that this “sickness behaviour” may assist the organism
to recover from infection. Immune activation is associated with the
production of cytokines, some of which (most notably, interleukin-1, IL-1)
have potent behavioural activities. IL-1 decreases several behavioural
activities, such as food intake, and sexual activity in females, but not
in males. Certain kinds of behavioural experiences, most notably stressful
ones, may induce immune activation and cytokine production. Environmental
stressors and immune activation produce some similar physiological responses:
increased body temperature, and activation of the sympathetic nervous system,
the adrenal medulla, and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, as well
as brain catecholamines and indoleamines. These observations have
led to the concept that pathogen invasion induces "immune stress."
The physiological responses induced can assist the defence of the organism
against infections, at least in part by changing behaviour. It is
argued that learned and reflexive behavioural strategies, and physiological
and behavioural responses to illness, are all important components of host
defence against pathogens [58].
7.
'MISSING SELF' AS A KEY TO INNATE IMMUNE ACTIVATION
The
concept of 'missing self', first was coined with respect to the failure
of activating NK cells due to the recognition of self-MHC [33]. This now
appears as an emerging common principle in innat. Sponges have phagocytic
cells for defence.e immunity. Another form of this strategy relies
on cell expression of terminal sialic acid on cell surface molecules versus
the lack of sialic acid on most microorganisms [59]. Sialic acid
binding siglecs are inhibitory receptors bearing tyrosine-based inhibitory
motifs (ITIMs). The lack of, or reductions in sialic acid on pathogens,
some virally infected or transformed cells and apoptotic cells may act
as missing self, allowing phagocytosis to proceed.
Complement,
the major noncellular system of innate immunity in humans, exhibits wide
ranging and potent biological activities which are under heavy regulation
employing several different strategies. Since complement can react
ubiquitously by binding covalently to self and non-self, regulator recognition
of self can provide one strategy for preventing attack on the host.
In this regard inhibition based on terminal sialic acid again contributes
in the form of sialic acid-binding factor H of the alternate complement
activation pathway, which promotes the inactivation of C3b and spares self
cells [30,60]. Furthermore, additional complement inhibitors, which
are broadly expressed and important in the control of complement activation
on self cells are membrane expressed CD46 and CD55 (decay-accelerating
factor, DAF) and the soluble and secreted C1 inhibitor and clusterin [61,
62]. All of these molecules are considered to constitute
"don't eat me" signaling markers (SAMPs) [61]. These contrast with
"eat me" markers in the form of soluble or secreted bridging molecules
of the innate immune system binding to pathogen-associate molecular patterns
(PAMPs) on pathogens and from apoptotic cell-associated molecular patters
(ACAMP). Additional "don't eat me" signals result from normal host
cell expression of CD200, CD47 and CD31, all of which engage inhibitory
pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and down-regulate phagocyte activities
[61]. While complex, this form of control is well adapted for attack
on pathogens not previously encountered. Furthermore,the lack of complement-receptor
1-related gene/protein y (Crry), a membrane-bound complement-regulatory
protein structurally similar to decay accelerating factor (DAF/CD55) and
membrane cofactor protein (MCP/CD46), resulted in complement deposition
at the fetomaternal interface and fetal loss in mice [63], clearly supporting
the essential nature of such 'self' expression in normal reproductive physiological
processes. Thus, normal self must also include complement regulatory molecules.
8.
APOPTOTIC CELLS AND THEIR PHAGOCYTOSIS
Our
increasing understanding of cellular "corpse" generation and elimination
[64] has contributed immensely to our appreciation of the scope of innate
immune function. The concept of physiological cell death emerged
from studies of animal development during the latter half of the 19th century
[65]. However, the idea that a cell can activate a suicidal program
of self-destruction (programmed cell death), which can be modified by external
signals has only been developed during the last half of the 20th century,
and this was considered essential for the development, homeostasis and
integrity of multicellular organisms [65]. The description of cell
death by apoptosis in the early 1970's provided a phenotype which became
a focus for the investigation of homeostatic, 'physiological' cell death
(cellular homeostasis) in normal and pathological tissues (e.g. cancer
regression) [66]. Apoptosis was viewed as a prelude to the orderly
removal of the non-viable cells by phagocytosis in the absence of inflammation.
The molecular processes of apoptosis was investigated as an active mechanism
of cell death induced by steroids, antibody-dependent cytolysis by lymphocyte
killer (K) cells, NK cells and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells consistent with its
generalized utility in biology [67, 68].
The
science of phagocytosis has undergone a revolution in the last few years
from a descriptive to an analytical approach [71], and combined with advances
in cytokine and chemokine research so has our appreciation of innate immunity.
The demonstration that while phagocytosis of necrotic cells, clearly a
danger signal, produces an inflammatory response, phagocytosis of apoptotic
cells does not provided further support for Matzinger's "danger"
hypothesis. Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells which have undergone
a process of programmed cell death is at the core of many biological processes,
pathological or physiological, which depend on the innate immune system.
9.
NATURAL IMMUNITY AND THE NATURAL IMMUNE SYSTEM
While
the innate immune system has traditionally been considered by many to have
evolved to defend against microbial pathogens [59,70-72], others have proposed
that the immune system did not evolve to fight infection [73,74]. Analysis
of allorecognition challenged the paradigm that vertebrate immunity is
pathogenetically focused and directed support toward the idea that preserving
individuality against the threat of invading conspecific cells (based on
polymorphic compatibility molecules) was probably the driving force for
all innate and adaptive immune systems and the defence function developed
later [74]. Key molecules of the mammalian innate and adaptive immune
systems were identified in sponges (Porifera) and some were considered
likely to have acquired dual functions during evolution, acting first in
adhesion and growth control and later in immune self/self- and self/non-self-recognition
[75]. The bountiful evidence for the role of innate immunity in cell modulatory
pathways of normal development reminds us of the limitations, folly even,
of taking a narrow reductionist approach to understanding and investigating
innate immunity. Investigation increasingly exposes the critical contributions
of components of the innate immune system in normal physiological functions
including, embryological development, reproduction, organ regeneration,
and wound healing [8]. Antimicrobial peptides contribute as growth
factors to wound healing and tissue repair. Phagocytes regulate angiogenesis
by secreting growth factors [76] and by remodeling vasculature through
macrophage-induced apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells [77,78].
Complement participates in crucial processes of normal development and
organ regeneration [69]. NK cells and macrophages are considered
important for a successful pregnancy contributing to implantation, vascularization,
growth factor production for the placenta and trophoblast differentiation
and parturition [79,80].
Several investigators have refuted the idea that
the innate immune system is non-specific [14,74], rather it is extremely
selective [61] and polyspecific, which is due to the multiple specificity
of receptors (e.g. natural antibodies), and the cross reactivity of homotopes
recognized by them.
Thus,
a broad definition of the innate immune system which allows for extensive
interpretation, would be an evolutionarily ancient, germline gene-dependent,
self-organizing system (implying self-recognition) acting in the interest
of survival. This would encompass all components of the immune system
which fit this description (including T and B cells activated other than
through specific clonaly-selected antigen recognition) participating in
defence and self-organizing functions.
10.
LINKS BETWEEN INNATE AND ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY
There
are many examples illustrating that the natural immune system serves as
a foundation, on which the adaptive immune system has evolved. Briefly,
the macrophage, which is a principal co-ordinator of natural immunity,
is also fundamental to adaptive immunity as an antigen presenting cell.
Moreover, macrophages initiate the acute phase response, which leads to
the inactivation of the thymus and the inhibition of adaptive immunity.
B lymphocytes secreting natural antibodies may have an effect on any lymphocyte
of the adaptive system that expresses Fc-receptors. Natural killer
cells produce IFN-gamma and other cytokiones that affect cells of the adaptive
system. Defensins also affect adaptive immunity. Complement has been
established as a vital link between natural and acquired immunity, profoundly
augmenting the antibody response to T-dependent antigens [79]. In turn,
activated T cells produce INF-gamma, the major cytokine activator of macrophages.
11.
CURRENT APPLICATIONS AND CHALLENGES
The
scope of natural immunity is vast and complicated by extraordinary diversity,
redundancy, cooperation and amplification. Research to date has established
the legitimacy of the field but the surge in exploration must continue
if we harbour any desire to live in harmony with our immune system. Nevertheless,
our increasing understanding of the mechanisms of the natural immune system
and its importance for the development of a strong adaptive response has
provided a strong incentive to better understand the dynamic interplay
between infectious agents and host defence in man [34] and to develop new
adjuvants as a component of improved vaccines. Current approaches
to immune potentiation and adjuvant design combined with vaccine delivery
are rapidly moving the field forward [81]. Toll-like receptors, in
particular, are being targeted in vaccine development and in cancer therapy
[82].
The
use of the innate immune system by itself has been proposed as a biodefence
strategy for protection against a broad and largely unforeseen range of
microbial pathogens which may be employed in bioweaponry [83,84]. This
could employ synthetic, conserved components of microbes recognized by
the Toll-like receptors and other receptors of the innate immune system.
Both prophylactic and post-exposure approaches appear to be working in
animals to prevent or reduce infections.
The
early suggestion of Metchnikoff to eat live bacteria to promote health
has seen a dramatic rise in popularity and has developed into the
field of probiotics, (eating live ‘good’ microbiota) and the related field,
prebiotics (eating non-digestible oligosaccharides that target pathological
microbiota) both with the idea of modifying the activity or composition
of the endogenous microbiota [85-87]. While the gut has been the
main focus of this probiotic research, endogenous microbiota found in other
parts of the body, (e.g. urogenital tract, skin and nasopharynx) have also
attracted attention and can be expected to yield success [87].
Clearly,
our understanding of the immunology of aging is of present and future economic
and political importance [88] considering the current large population
of aging ‘baby boomers’ and future increases in the proportion of older
people and in the age of old people that are generally predicted to happen.
Since natural immunity seems to be less affected by age than the adaptive
response (Salvioli et al, this volume), the ability to manipulate the natural
immune system will be needed to maintain a good quality of life in old
age. With regard to natural immunity, which is heavily regulated by the
environment, both external and internal, probably the most important decision
an individual can make is to choose a healthy life style in order to maintain
the natural and adaptive immune systems for a long, high quality life.
|
References
 |
[1] |
Berczi
I. Neuroendocrine response to endotoxin. Ann NY Acad Sci 1998;851:411-415 |
 |
[2] |
Berczi
I, Bertok L, Chow DA. Natural immunity and neuroimmune host defence. Ann
NY Acad Sci 2001;917:248-257 |
 |
[3] |
Haeryfar SMM, Berczi I. The thymus and the acute phase response. Cell Mol Biol 47:145-156,2001 |
 |
[4] |
Berczi
I, Nagy E, Baral E, Szentivanyi, A. Sterid Hormones. In “Neuroimmmune Biology,
Volume 3: The Immune-Neuroendocrine Circuitry. History and Progress”. Berczi
I, Szentivanyi A, Editors, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003; pp. 221-270 |
 |
[5] |
Gabry
KE, Chrousos G, Gold PW. The hypothalamus - Pituitary - Adrenal (HPA) Axis:
Mediator of the adaptive response to stress. In “Neuroimmmune Biology,
Volume 3: The Immune-Neuroendocrine Circuitry. History and Progress”. Berczi
I, Szentivanyi A, Editors, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003; pp. 379-414. |
 |
[6] |
Berczi
I. The role of the growth and lactogenic hormone family in immune function.
Neuroimmunomodulation 1994;1:201-216 |
 |
[7] |
Cooper
EL. Effector mechanisms of Natural Immunity: an invertebrate perspective.
In Neuroimmmune Biology, volume 5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I
and Szentivanyi A. Series Eds; Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[8] |
Chow
D. Physiological Activities of the Natural Immune System. In Neuroimmmune
Biology, volume 5. |
 |
[9] |
Chow
DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi A. Series Eds; Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[10] |
Salvioli
S, Capri M, Fumelli M, Lescal F, Monti D, Franceschi C. Pathological
relevance of the natural immune system. In Neuroimmmune Biology, volume
5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi A. Series Eds; Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[11] |
Berczi
I, Szentivanyi A. Immune reactions. In: The immune-neuroendocrine circuitry.
History and progress. Neuroimmune Biology, Volume 3. Berczi I, Szentivanyi
A. Eds, Series Eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003; pp 315-377. |
 |
[12] |
Bertók
L. Experiments for the alteration of the species specific resistance by
inhibition of protein-synthesis (Hungarian). Budapest: PhD Thesis;1964 |
 |
[13] |
Gergely
J. Phylogenesis and ontogenesis of immune response. In: Csaba Gy, editor.
Actual problems of biology. (Hungarian). Budapest: Medicina, 1974;9-53 |
 |
[14] |
Metchnikoff
E. Immunity in infective diseases. Cambridge: Camridge Univ Press;1907 |
 |
[15] |
Revillard
JP. Innate immunology. Eur J Dermatol 2002; 12: 224-7. |
 |
[16] |
Tauber
AI. Metchnikoff and phagocytosis theory. Nature Reviews Molecular cell
Biology 2003; 4: 897-901. |
 |
[17] |
Tauber
AI, Chernyak L. Metchnikoff and the Origins of Immunology: From Metaphor
to Theory. Oxford University Press 1991: 25-67. |
 |
[18] |
Tauber
AI, Chernyak L. The birth of immunology. II. Metchnikoff and his critics.
Cell Immunol 1989 Jul; 121(2): 447-73 |
 |
[19] |
Tauber
AI. Moving beyond the immune self. Immunology 2000; 12: 241-8. |
 |
[20] |
Podolsky
S. Cultural divergence: Elie Metchnikoff=s Bacillus bulgaricus therapy
and his underlying concept of health. Bull History Med 1998; 72.1:1-27. |
 |
[21] |
Burnet
FM. The clonal selection theory of acquired immunity. Vanderbilt University
Press 1959. |
 |
[22] |
Jerne NK. Toward a network theory of the immune system. Ann Inst Pasteur Immunol
(Paris) 1974; 125C: 373-89. |
 |
[23] |
Barnes
RD. Invertebrate Zoology. Third Edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1974 |
 |
[24] |
Hood
L, Huang HV, Dreyer WJ. The area code hypothesis. The immune system
provides clues to understanding the genetic and molecular basis of cell
recognition during development. J Systamol Struct 1987;7:531-559 |
 |
[25] |
Thiery
JP. Cell adhesion molecules as morphoregulators. A short survey.
In: Burger MM, Sordat B, Zinkernagel RM, editors. Cell to Cell Interaction.
Basel: Karger, 1990;242-246 |
 |
[26] |
Aguayo AJ, Villegas-Perez MP, Vidal-Sanz M, Carter D, Bray GM. Influences of non-neuronal
tissues on the regeneration of injured nerve cells in the central nervous
system of adult mammals. In Burger MM, Sordat B, Zinkernagel RM,
editors. Cell to Cell Interaction. Basel: Karger, 1990; 40-61 |
 |
[27] |
Sharon
N. Lectin-carbohydrate complexes of plants and animals: An atomic view.
Trends Biochem Sci 1993;18:221-226 |
 |
[28] |
Berczi
I, Szentivanyi A. Adhesion molecules. In “Neuroimmmune Biology”, Volume
3: The Immune-Neuroendocrine Circuitry. History and Progress. Berczi I,
Szentivanyi A, Editors, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003; pp. 99-115. |
 |
[29] |
Murphy WJ, Reynolds CW, Tiberghien P, Longo DL. Natural killer cells and bone
marrow transplantation J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:1475-82. |
 |
[30] |
Haller
O, Örn A. In vivo activity of murine NK cells. Editor Herberman RB.
in Natural Cell-Mediated immunity Against Tumors, 1980; 1105-15. |
 |
[31] |
Crocker
PR, Varki A. Siglecs in the immune system. Immunology 2001;103(2):137 |
 |
[32] |
Keissling
R, Klein E, Wigzell H. “Natural” killer cells in the mouse. I. Cytotoxic
cells with specificity for mouse Moloney leukaemia cells. Specificity and
distribution according to genotype. Eur J Immunol 1975;5:112-7. |
 |
[33] |
Herberman RB, Nunn ME. Lavrin DH. Natural cytotoxic reactivity of mouse lymphoid
cells against syngeneic and allogeneic tumours. I. Distribution of reactivity
and specificity. Int J Cancer 1975;16:216-29. |
 |
[34] |
Kärre
K. How to recognize a foreign submarine. Immunol Rev. 1997;155:5-9. |
 |
[35] |
Ezekowitz RAB, Hoffman JA. Innate Immunity. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2003. |
 |
[36] |
Gallucci
S, Lolkema M, Matzinger P. Natural adjuvants: Endogenous activators of
dendritic cells. Nat Med 1999; 5:1249-55. |
 |
[37] |
Beutler
B, Rietschel ET. Innate immune sensing and its roots: the story of endotoxin.
Nature Reviews Immunology 2003; 3: 169-76. |
 |
[38] |
Weber
JR, Moreillon P, Tuomanen EI. Innate sensors for Gram-positive bacteria.
Current Opin Immunol 2003; 15: 408-15. |
 |
[39] |
Huttner,
KM. Antimicrobial Peptides - The Defence Never Rests. In Neuroimmmune Biology,
volume 5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi A. Series
Eds; Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[40] |
Wong
HR. Endogenous cytoprotective mechanisms. In Neuroimmmune Biology, volume
5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi A. Series Eds; Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[41] |
Bertok
L, The Role of Bile Acids in Natural Resistance: physico-chemical host
defence In Neuroimmmune Biology, volume 5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi
I and Szentivanyi A. Series Eds; Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[42] |
Herberman RB. A Historical Introduction of Natural Killer (NK) Cells and Current
Status of Their Role in Host Defences In Neuroimmmune Biology, volume 5.
Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi A. Series Eds; Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[43] |
Djeu JY, Blanchard DK. Regulation of human polymorphonuclear neutriphil (PMN)
activity against Candida albicans by large granular lymphocytes via release
of a PMN-activating factor J Immunol 1987;139:2761-2. |
 |
[44] |
Lázár
G, Husztik E, Lázár G, Jr. The Role of the
Reticuloendothelial System in Natural Immunity In Neuroimmmune Biology,
volume 5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi A. Series
Eds; Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[45] |
Chow
DA. Natural immune activation: stimulators/receptors. In Neuroimmmune Biology,
volume 5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi A. Series
Eds; Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[46] |
Arneson LN, Leibson PJ. Signalling in Natural Immunity: Natural Killer Cells In
Neuroimmmune Biology, volume 5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and
Szentivanyi A. Series Eds; Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[47] |
Flo, TH, Aderem A. Pathogen recognition by Toll-like receptors In Neuroimmmune
Biology, volume 5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi
A. Series Eds; Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[48] |
Bosinger
SE, Hoisawa KA, Cameron CM, Devries ME, Coombs JC. Cameron MJ, Kelvin
DJ.Molecular control of leukocyte trafficking - Internal regulatory circuits
of the immune system: Leukocyte circulation and homing In Neuroimmmune
Biology, volume 5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi
A. Series Eds; Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[49] |
Barlic
J, Khandaker MH, Mahon E, Andrews J, DeVries ME, Mitchell GB et al. beta-arrestins
regulate interleukin-8-induced CXCR1 internalization. J Biol Chem 1999;274(23):16287-94. |
 |
[50] |
Barlic
J, Andrews JD, Kelvin AA, Bosinger SE, DeVries ME, Xu L et al. Regulation
of tyrosine kinase activation and granule release through beta-arrestin
by CXCRI. Nat Immunol 2000;1(3):227-33. |
 |
[51] |
Zou
YR, Kottmann AH, Kuroda M, Taniuchi I, Littman DR. Function of the chemokine
receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development. Nature
1998;393(6685):595-9. |
 |
[52] |
Poznansky
MC, Olszak IT, Evans RH, Wang Z, Foxall RB, Olson DP et al. Thymocyte emigration
is mediated by active movement away from stroma-derived factors. J Clin
Invest 2002;109(8):1101-10. |
 |
[53] |
Berczi
I. Neuroendocrine Regulation of Natural Immunity. In Neuroimmmune Biology,
volume 5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi A. Series
Eds; Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[54] |
Pedersen
BK. Natural immunity -Effect of exercise. In Neuroimmmune Biology, volume
5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi A. Series Eds; Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[55] |
Droller MJ, Perlmann P, Schneider MU. Enhancement of natural and antibody-dependent
lymphocyte cytotoxicity by drugs which inhibit prostaglandin production
by tumor target cells. Cell Immunol 1978;39(1):154-64. |
 |
[56] |
Hoffman-Goetz
L, Simpson JR, Cipp N, Arumugam Y, Houston ME. Lymphocyte subset responses
to repeated submaximal exercise in men. J Appl Physiol 1990;68(3):1069-74. |
 |
'57] |
Bertok
L. A new prospect for the enhancement of natural immunity. In Neuroimmmune
Biology, volume 5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi
A. Series Eds; Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[58] |
Larson SJ, Dunn A. Behavioral Mechanisms for Defense Against Pathogens In Neuroimmmune
Biology, volume 5. Chow DA and Bertok L. Eds; Berczi I and Szentivanyi
A. Series Eds; Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004 (this volume). |
 |
[59] |
Medzhitov
R, Janeway Jr CA. Decoding the patterns of self and nonself by the innate
immune system. Science 2002; 296: 298-300. |
 |
[60] |
Pilatte
Y, Bignon J, Lambre CR. Sialic acids as important molecules in the regulation
of the immune system: pathophysiological implications of sialidases in
immunity. Glycobiology 1993:3(3):201-18. |
 |
[61] |
Elward
K, Gasque P. Molecular Immunol. 2003; 40: 85-94. |
 |
[62] |
Pangburn
MK, Pangburn KL, Koistinen V, Meri S, Sharma AK. Molecular mechanisms
of target recognition in an innate immune system: interactions among factor
H, C3b, and target in the alternative pathway of human complement. J Immunol.
2000 May 1; 164(9): 4742-51. |
 |
[63] |
Caucheteux
SM, Kanellopoulos-Langevin C, Ojcius DM. At the innate frontiers between
mother and fetus: linking abortion with complement activation. Immunity
2003; 18: 169-72. |
 |
[64] |
Savill
J, Fadok V. Corpse clearance defines the meaning of cell death. Nature
2000; 407:784-8. |
 |
[65] |
Ameisen JC. On the origin, evolution and nature of programmed cell death: a timeline
of four billion years. Cell Death and Differentiation 2002; 9: 367-93. |
 |
[66] |
Kerr JFR, Wylie AH, Currie AR. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with
widespread implications in tissue kinetics. Brit J Cancer 1972; 26: 239-57. |
 |
[67] |
Alenzi FQ, Warrens AN. Cellular and molecular themes in apoptosis. Wien Klin Wochenschr.
2003 Sep 15; 115(15-16): 563-74. |
 |
[68] |
Lawen
A. Apoptosis-an introduction. BioEssays 2003; 25: 888-96. |
 |
[69] |
Sansonetti PJ. Phagocytosis, a cell biology view. J Cell Sci 2000 Oct; 111 (pt 19):
3355-6 |
 |
[70] |
Janeway
CA Jr. The immune system evolved to discriminate infectious nonself from
noninfectious self. Immunol Today 1992; 13(1):11-6. |
 |
[71] |
Medzhitov
R, Janeway CA Jr. Innate immunity: impact on the adaptive immune response.
Curr Opin Immunol 1997;147(1):4-9. |
 |
[72] |
Mushegian
A, Medzhitov R. Evolutionary perspective on innate immune recognition.
J Cell Biology 2001; 155: 705-10 |
 |
[73] |
Stewart
J. Immunoglobulins did not arise in evolution to fight infection. Immunol
Today 1992; 13: 396-9. |
 |
[74] |
Rinkevich
B. Invertebrates versus vertebrates innate immunity: in the light of evolution.
Scand J Immunol 1999; 50: 456-60. |
 |
[75] |
Müller
WEG, Blumbach B, Müller IM. Evolution of the innate and adaptive immune
systems: relationships between potential immune molecules in the lowest
metazoan phylum (porifera) and those in vertebrates. Transplantation 1999;
68(9): 1215-27. |
 |
[76] |
Sunderkotter
C, Steinbrink K, Goebeler M, Bhasdwaj R, Sorg C. Macrophages and angiogenesis.
J Leuk Biol 1994; 55: 410-22. |
 |
[77] |
Diez-Roux
G, Lang RA. A macrophage induced apoptosis in normal cells in vivo. Development
1997; 124: 3633-38. |
 |
[78] |
Diez-Roux
G, Argilla M, Makarenkova H, Ko K, Lang R. Macrophages kill capillary cells
in G phase of the cell cycle during programmed vascular regression. Development
1999; 126: 2141-7. |
 |
[79] |
Veenstra
van Nieuwenhovten AL, Heineman MJ, Faas MM. The immunology of successful
pregnancy. Human Reproduction Update 2003; 9: 347-57. |
 |
[80] |
Hunt
JS, Petroff MG, Burnett TG. Uterine leukocytes: key players in pregnancy.
Cell & Developmental Biology 2000; 11: 127-37. |
 |
[81] |
O’Hagen
DT, Valiente NM. Recent advances in the discovery and delivery of vaccine
adjuvants. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2003 Sep;2(9):727-35. |
 |
[82] |
Rogatsky
I. Drug discovery for inflammatory diseases. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2003
Sep;3(6):1001-4. |
 |
[83] |
Hackett
CJ. Innate immune activation as a broad-spectrum biodefense strategy: Prospects
and research challenges. J Allerg Clin Immunol 2003 ;112(4):686-94. |
 |
[84] |
Hilleman
MR. Overview: cause and prevention in biowarfare and bioterrorism. Vacine
2002;20:3055-67. |
 |
[85] |
Mercenier
A, Pavan S, Pot B. Probiotics as biotherapeutic agents:present knowledge
and future prospects. Curr Pharm Des 2003;9(2):175-91. |
 |
[86] |
Tuohy
KM, Probert HM, Smejkal CW, Gibson GR. Using probiotics to improve gut
health. Drug Discov Today 2003 Aug;8(15):692-700. |
 |
[87] |
Ouwehand
AC. Probiotics: time to move beyond Metchnikoff? Drug Discov Today 2003
Dec;8(23):1063. |
 |
[88] |
Butler
RN. Economic and political implications of immunology and aging on tomorrow’s
society. Mech Ageing Dev 1997 Feb; 93(1-3):7-13. |
|