courses

PLNT 4580 Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

 Term I - September - December

Instructor

Goals

Objectives

Text

Additional References

Schedule

 

 

Evaluation

Papers for presentations

Late Submissions

General Academic Regulations

 

 

Project

 

Instructor

 

Office

Telephone

E-mail

Dr. F. DAAYF

225 Agriculture

204-474-6096

Daayff@ms.umanitoba.ca

    The instructor is available for consultation any time except during class time .

Goals

To describe general principles and mechanisms of plant-microbe interactions, such as the “gene-for-gene” model. Examples describing molecular and biochemical mechanisms of plant-microbe recognition, pathogenesis, and plant responses to infection will be studied. Students will be introduced to both beneficial and deleterious associations of microbes with plants, biochemical and molecular mechanisms surrounding such associations, and some of the technniques used to generate knowledge in this area.

  Objectives

Understanding the principles of plant-microbe interactions at the biochemical/molecular levels, through study of the following:

- Host-pathogen models (i.e., gene-for-gene system)

- Plant-Microbe recognition,

- Molecular and biochemical bases of pathogenesis

- Molecular and biochemical mechanisms of plant defenses (Structural versus induced defenses, Local versus systemic resistance, Signaling in plant-disease resistance, The Hypersensitive Response, Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) versus Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR)

- Signaling in plant-microbe intearctions

- Introduction to beneficial associations of microbes with plants (Symbiosis, PGPRs for biocontrol)

Text

- No mandatory textbook.

- Suggested books:

* Plant Pathology by George N. Agrios, Fifth Edition

* Molecular Plant Pathology by Dickinson M. & Beynon J. (eds.)

* Biology of Plant-Microbe Interactions, by Leong S.A., Allen C., and Triplett E.W. (eds)

* Molecular Aspects of Pathogenicity and Resistance: Requirement for Signal Transduction, by Mills D., Kunoh H., Keen N., and Mayama S. (eds).

Additional References

Schedule

3h-weekly meetings, including (i) lectures by instructor, (ii) student presentations, and (iii) class discussions.

Students will be assigned readings, and will make presentations about the assigned readings. They will also have individual term paper projects, which they will have the opportunity to develop throughout the term, and present before the term ends.

Evaluation

Reading/Presentations: (30%)

Each student will have to make 3 presentations throughout the term. For each presentation, each student will have one review + one research papers to read and present. The student should present the research paper, but must use the review paper to introduce the audience to concepts, terminology, or recent findings. Each presentation is worth 10%.

Participation to class discussion: (10%)

Participation to class discussion will be marked.

Term paper project: (20%)

Every student will choose a subject from a list proposed by the instructor, gather the appropriate literature on the subject, and write a term review paper (10%).

Before the end of the term, each student will have the opportunity to make a presentation of their paper in front of an audience (10%).

Mid-term written exam: (25%)

Final oral exam: (15%)


#

Topic

%

01

  Reading/Presentations (10% each)

30

02

  Participation to class discussion

10

04

  Term paper project (10% presentation + 10% report)

20

05   Mid-term written exam
25

06

  Final oral exam 

15

 

                    TOTAL

  100%

Papers for presentations

1- THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL C H EMISTRY 1992 Vol. 267, No. 15, pp. 10258-10265
Elicitors and Suppressors of the Defense Response in Tomato Cells
Christoph W. Basse, Klaus Bock, and Thomas Boller

2-FEBS Letters 571 (2004) 31–34
Tomatidine and lycotetraose, hydrolysis products of a-tomatine by Fusarium oxysporum tomatinase, suppress induced defense responses in tomato cells
Shin-ichi Itoa,*, Tomomi Etoa, Shuhei Tanakaa, Naoki Yamauchia, Hiroyuki Takaharab, Tsuyoshi Ikeda

3-Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2001, pp. 506–511.
Plant Resistance Suppressors in the Pathosystem Formed by Potato and the Causal Agent of Late Blight
O. L. Ozeretskovskaya, N. I. Vasyukova, E. A. Perekhod, G. I. Chalenko, L. I. Il’inskaya, and N. G. Gerasimova

4-Journal of biological chemistry
A Kazal-like extracellular Serine protease inhibitor from P. infestans targets the tomato PR protease P69B.
Tian et al.

5-European Journal of Plant Pathology 104: 777–783, 1998.
Effect of glucans from different races of Phytophthora infestans on defense reactions in potato tuber
A. Andreu, C. Tonon, M. VanDamme, M. Huarte and G. Daleo

6-Euphytica 95: 167–172, 1997.
Resistance to late blight in potato. A putative gene that suppresses R genes and is elicited by specific isolates
M.E. Ordonez, G.A. Forbes & B.R. Trognitz

7-J. Phytopathology 153, 15–26 (2005)
Suppression of the Defence-Related Oxidative Burst in Bean Leaf Tissue and Bean Suspension Cells by the Necrotrophic Pathogen Botrytis cinerea
Ch. Unger, S. Kleta1, G. Jandl and A. v. Tiedemann

8-Plant Cell Rep (2004) 23:504–511
Powdery mildew pathogens can suppress the chitinase gene expression induced in detached inner epidermis of barley coleoptile
K. Fujita · Y. Matsuda · M. Wada · Y. Hirai · K. Mori ·N. Moriura · T. Nonomura · K. Kakutani · H. Toyoda

9- The Plant Cell, Vol. 4, 1333-1344
Differential lnduction and Suppression of Potato 3-Hydroxy-3-MethylgIutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Genes in Response to Phytophthora infestans and to Its Elicitor Arachidonic Acid
Doi Choi, Bernard L. Ward, and Richard M. Bostock

10-The Plant Cell, Vol. 3, 397-405, April 1991 O 1991 American Society of Plant Physiologists
Differential Activation of Potato 3-Hvdroxv-3-methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Genes by Wounding and Pathogen Challenge
Zhenbiao Yang, Heesung Park, George H. Lacy, and Carole L. Cramer

11-The Plant Cell, Vol. 16, 3460–3479, December 2004
Antagonistic Interaction between Abscisic Acid and Jasmonate-Ethylene Signaling Pathways Modulates Defense Gene Expression and Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis
Jonathan P. Anderson, Ellet Badruzsaufari, Peer M. Schenk, John M. Manners, Olivia J. Desmond, Christina Ehlert, Donald J. Maclean, Paul R. Ebert, and Kemal Kazan

12-MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY (2000) 1:115–123Blackwell Science, Ltd
Cell-specific expression of salicylate hydroxylase in an attempt to separate localized HR and systemic signaling establishing SAR in tobacco
ROBERT M. DARBY, ANNE MADDISON, LUIS A. J. MUR, YONG-MEI BI, ANDJOHN DRAPER

13-Plant Physiol Biochem. 2006;44:143-51
Involvement of phospholipases C and D in early response to SAR and ISR inducers in Brassica napus plants.
Profotova B, Burketova L, Novotna Z, Martinec J, Valentova O.

14-Plant Mol Biol. 2005; 57:731-48.
Colonization of the Arabidopsis rhizosphere by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. activates a root-specific, ethylene-responsive PR-5 gene in the vascular bundle.
Leon-Kloosterziel KM, Verhagen BW, Keurentjes JJ, VanPelt JA, Rep M, VanLoon LC, Pieterse CM.

15-MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY (2005) 6, 65–78
Nitric oxide contributes both to papilla-based resistance and the hypersensitive response in barley attacked by Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei
ELENA PRATS, LUIS A. J. MUR, RUTH SANDERSON AND TIMOTHY L. W. CARVER

16-Molecular Microbiology 2004, 51:925–936
A Gα -subunit controls zoospore motility and virulence in the potato late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans .
Maita Latijnhouwers, Wilco Ligterink, Vivianne G.A.A. Vleeshouwers, Pieter van West, and Francine Govers

17- Plant J. 2002;32:361-73.
Expression of a Phytophthora sojae necrosis-inducing protein occurs during transition from biotrophy to necrotrophy.
Qutob D, Kamoun S, Gijzen M.

18- Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69: 7343–7353.
Concomitant Induction of Systemic Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans in Cucumber by Trichoderma asperellum (T-203) and Accumulation of Phytoalexins
Iris Yedidia, Michal Shoresh, Zohar Kerem, Nicole Benhamou, Yoram Kapulnik, and Ilan Chet

19- MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2005, 39: 191-199
Identification and characterization of differentially expressed ESTs of Gossypium barbadense infected by Verticillium dahliae with suppression subtractive hybridization
Zuo KJ, Wang J, Wu WS, Chai YR, Sun XF, Tang KX

20- Plant Physiol. 1997;113:719-727.
Evidence of Phytoalexins in Cucumber Leaves Infected with Powdery Mildew following Treatment with Leaf Extracts of Reynoutria sachalinensis.
Daayf F, Schmitt A, Belanger RR.

21- Phytopathology 1997, 87:868-876.
Phytoalexin production in an apple cultivar resistant to Venturia inaequalis.
Hrazdina, G., Borejsza-Wysocki, W., and Lester, C..

22- Planta (2000) 210: 853-864
The hypersensitive response is associated with host and nonhost resistance to Phytophthora infestans
Vivianne G. A. A. Vleeshouwers, Willem van Dooijeweert, Francine Govers, Sophien Kamoun, Leontine T. Colon

23- FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006 Sep 29,
Spatial and temporal expression patterns of Avr1b-1 and defense-related genes in soybean plants upon infection with Phytophthora sojae.
Valer K, Fliegmann J, Frohlich A, Tyler BM, Ebel J.

24- MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY (2005) 6 (1) , 65–78Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
Nitric oxide contributes both to papilla-based resistance and the hypersensitive response in barley attacked by Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei
ELENA PRATS, LUIS A. J. MUR, RUTH SANDERSON AND TIMOTHY L. W. CARVER

25- Protoplasma 2006 Oct 6
Verticillium dahliae toxin induced alterations of cytoskeletons and nucleoli in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cells.
Yuan HY, Yao LL, Jia ZQ, Li Y, Li YZ.

26- J Plant Physiol. 2004 Dec;161(12):1367-77. Links
Ultrastructural changes and location of beta-1, 3-glucanase in resistant and susceptible cotton callus cells in response to treatment with toxin of Verticillium dahliae and salicylic acid.
Zhen XH, Li YZ.

REVIEWS

The plant cell 1992, 4:1333-1344; Differential induction and suppression of potato 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase genes in response to Phytophthora infestans and to its elicitor arachidonic acid.
Choi D, Ward BL, Bostock RM. 

New Phytologist 1998, 139:293-300, Differential expression of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase genes in barley induced by fungal infection or elicitors
T. KERVINEN , S. PELTONEN, T. H. TEERI and R. KARJALAINEN

Trends in Plant Science 2002 (7):440-444; Suppression of plant defence in rhizobia-legume symbiosis.
Mithofer A.

Trends in Microbiology 2003(11):462-469; Oomycetes and fungi: similar weaponry to attack plants.
Latijnhouwers M, de Wit PJ, Govers F.

Current opinion in Plant Biology 2004 (7) ; Strategies used by bacteria………
Abramovitch and Martin:

Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2003, 6:320–326; Establishing compatibility between plants and obligate biotrophic pathogens
Ralph Panstruga

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006 Sep 29, Spatial and temporal expression patterns of Avr1b-1 and defense-related genes in soybean plants upon infection with Phytophthora sojae.
Valer K, Fliegmann J, Frohlich A, Tyler BM, Ebel J.

MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2004, 5:495–504; Pathogen-induced resistance and alarm signals in the phloem
AART JE, VAN BEL, AND FRANK GAUPELS

Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2003, 6:300–306; Early signal transduction events in specific plant disease resistance
John P Rathjen and Peter Moffett

TRENDS IN GENETICS 2000 (16):449-455; Interplay of signaling pathways in plant disease resistance
Bart J. Feys AND Jane E. Parker

Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2003, 6:358–364; Secondary metabolite signalling in host–parasitic plant interactions
Harro J Bouwmeester, Radoslava Matusova, Sun Zhongkui andMichael H Beale

Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2003, 6:365–371; The salicylic acid loop in plant defense
Jyoti Shah

Current opinion in plant biology 2002, 5:325-331; Cross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense.
Kunkel BN, Brooks DM.

Late Submissions

Assignments that are submitted after the stated deadline will be deducted 5 % a day of the grade up to the end of the first week and 25 % thereafter for each week the assignment is late.

General Academic Regulations

Please refer to the University of Manitoba General Calendar for regulations regarding plagiarism and cheating and examination impersonation.

Please note that assignments, reports, or exams which are illegible or poorly written may be subject to refusal or deduction of the final grade.

Project

Term papers will be assigned to each student. Information should be gathered from research/review papers and summarized into a short report. The length of each report and the quantity of references to be used will be discussed in class.

The list of topics will be provided in class.