The problem
Six gamma-globin genes (four human and two chimp) are used for
pylogenetic analysis. The question is: is it valid to construct a
pylogenetic tree as a single unit, or do different parts of gene have
distinct evolutionary histories?
The approach to anwser....
(1) At first, print out
the alignments using "Alignment--->Reform? The alignment for working with...
(2) Construct a tree of the
entire alignment (Maximum Parsomony with bootstrapping): Outfile; Treefile
![]() |
Figure 1. Pylogenetic Tree Produced From The Entire Alignment The resulted tree on the left looks very good, which is supported by high value of bootstrapping (>92%). The gamma globin genes are reported to be subject to gene convertion--"noreciprocal transfer of genetic information", which often occurs in a part of gene. Thus, some parts of gamma genes may have seperate evolu- tionary histories from other region. The next step is to investigate if different parts of the sequence give differ- ent trees (different evolutionary histories). |
Tree Name |
Tree |
Out
file |
Tree
file |
Tree
Name |
Tree |
Out
file |
Tree
file |
I
|
![]() |
Click |
Click |
II
|
![]() |
Click |
Click |
III
|
![]() |
Click |
Click |
IV
|
![]() |
Click |
Click |
V |
![]() |
Click |
Click |
VI |
![]() |
Click |
Click |
VI |
![]() |
Click |
Click |
Except some branches, especially in Tree II & III with the
values of bootstrapping <50% (ellipse area, thus Tree II & III
not reliable), the most of resulted trees in Figure 2 are very
reliable, which are strongly supported by bootstrapping (>70%).
Although some branches in Tree I and VI, see figure 2, are not very
consistently replicated, their values of bootstrapping are 58% and
60%--- indicating that branches are clustered as above which are more
likely true in about 60% of trees and shoud not effect the
whole topologies of trees. Thus, the topologies of Tree I, IV, V, VI,
and VII should be reliable. Comparing the topologies of Tree I, IV, V,
VI, and VII with each other, we found that they are all different.
Because each mentioned tree is built from one region of gamma
globin gene, which gives a consistant tree across all bootstrapped
replicates, it probably has evolved as a coherent unit over time. The
above result suggests these regiones
defined from above to build different trees (I, IV,V,VI, and VII) may
represent different evolutionary histories.
Therefore, the gamma globin genes don't evolve as a single unit!
(1) All of parts of alignment of gamma globin gene don't share the
same tree since up to 5 regions show different trees.
(2) The whole alignment of gamma globin sequences can be broken up to
at least 5 distinct regions, which have separate evolutionary histories
from other regions. These 5 regions are defined as following (positions
below are based on The Alignment):
a. 1--324
b. 1277--1441
c. 1442--1681
d. 1732--1839
e. 1840--2320
In the region 325--1183, we should be more
cautious and take more analysis... ...
(3) The tree built from the entire alignment of gamma globin gene is
definitely not valid since up to 5 regions have evolved as a
coherent unit over time.