\chapter{Sequence annotation objects}
\label{chapter:SeqRecord}

Chapter~\ref{chapter:Bio.Seq} introduced the sequence classes.  Immediately ``above'' the \verb|Seq| class is the Sequence Record or \verb|SeqRecord| class, defined in the \verb|Bio.SeqRecord| module. This class allows higher level features such as identifiers and features (as \verb|SeqFeature| objects) to be associated with the sequence, and is used throughout the sequence input/output interface \verb|Bio.SeqIO| described fully in Chapter~\ref{chapter:Bio.SeqIO}.

If you are only going to be working with simple data like FASTA files, you can probably skip this chapter
for now. If on the other hand you are going to be using richly annotated sequence data, say from GenBank
or EMBL files, this information is quite important.

While this chapter should cover most things to do with the \verb|SeqRecord| and \verb|SeqFeature| objects in this chapter, you may also want to read the \verb|SeqRecord| wiki page (\url{http://biopython.org/wiki/SeqRecord}), and the built in documentation (also online -- \href{http://biopython.org/DIST/docs/api/Bio.SeqRecord.SeqRecord-class.html}{SeqRecord} and \href{http://biopython.org/DIST/docs/api/Bio.SeqFeature.SeqFeature-class.html}{SeqFeature}):

\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio.SeqRecord import SeqRecord
>>> help(SeqRecord)
...
\end{verbatim}

\section{The SeqRecord object}
\label{sec:SeqRecord}

The \verb|SeqRecord| (Sequence Record) class is defined in the \verb|Bio.SeqRecord| module. This class allows higher level features such as identifiers and features to be associated with a sequence (see Chapter~\ref{chapter:Bio.Seq}), and is the basic data type for the \verb|Bio.SeqIO| sequence input/output interface (see Chapter~\ref{chapter:Bio.SeqIO}).

The \verb|SeqRecord| class itself is quite simple, and offers the following information as attributes:

\begin{description}
  \item[.seq] -- The sequence itself, typically a \verb|Seq| object.

  \item[.id] -- The primary ID used to identify the sequence -- a string. In most cases this is something like an accession number.

  \item[.name] -- A ``common'' name/id for the sequence -- a string. In some cases this will be the same as the accession number, but it could also be a clone name. I think of this as being analogous to the LOCUS id in a GenBank record.

  \item[.description] -- A human readable description or expressive name for the sequence -- a string.

  \item[.letter\_annotations] -- Holds per-letter-annotations using a (restricted) dictionary of additional information about the letters in the sequence. The keys are the name of the information, and the information is contained in the value as a Python sequence (i.e. a list, tuple or string) with the same length as the sequence itself.  This is often used for quality scores (e.g. Section~\ref{sec:FASTQ-filtering-example}) or secondary structure information (e.g. from Stockholm/PFAM alignment files).

  \item[.annotations] -- A dictionary of additional information about the sequence. The keys are the name of the information, and the information is contained in the value. This allows the addition of more ``unstructured'' information to the sequence.

  \item[.features] -- A list of \verb|SeqFeature| objects with more structured information about the features on a sequence (e.g. position of genes on a genome, or domains on a protein sequence). The structure of sequence features is described below in Section~\ref{sec:seq_features}.

  \item[.dbxrefs] - A list of database cross-references as strings.
\end{description}

\section{Creating a SeqRecord}

Using a \verb|SeqRecord| object is not very complicated, since all of the
information is presented as attributes of the class. Usually you won't create
a \verb|SeqRecord| ``by hand'', but instead use \verb|Bio.SeqIO| to read in a
sequence file for you (see Chapter~\ref{chapter:Bio.SeqIO} and the examples
below).  However, creating \verb|SeqRecord| can be quite simple.

\subsection{SeqRecord objects from scratch}

To create a \verb|SeqRecord| at a minimum you just need a \verb|Seq| object:

%doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio.Seq import Seq
>>> simple_seq = Seq("GATC")
>>> from Bio.SeqRecord import SeqRecord
>>> simple_seq_r = SeqRecord(simple_seq)
\end{verbatim}

Additionally, you can also pass the id, name and description to the initialization function, but if not they will be set as strings indicating they are unknown, and can be modified subsequently:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> simple_seq_r.id
'<unknown id>'
>>> simple_seq_r.id = "AC12345"
>>> simple_seq_r.description = "Made up sequence I wish I could write a paper about"
>>> print(simple_seq_r.description)
Made up sequence I wish I could write a paper about
>>> simple_seq_r.seq
Seq('GATC', Alphabet())
\end{verbatim}

Including an identifier is very important if you want to output your \verb|SeqRecord| to a file.  You would normally include this when creating the object:

%doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio.Seq import Seq
>>> simple_seq = Seq("GATC")
>>> from Bio.SeqRecord import SeqRecord
>>> simple_seq_r = SeqRecord(simple_seq, id="AC12345")
\end{verbatim}

As mentioned above, the \verb|SeqRecord| has an dictionary attribute \verb|annotations|. This is used
for any miscellaneous annotations that doesn't fit under one of the other more specific attributes.
Adding annotations is easy, and just involves dealing directly with the annotation dictionary:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> simple_seq_r.annotations["evidence"] = "None. I just made it up."
>>> print(simple_seq_r.annotations)
{'evidence': 'None. I just made it up.'}
>>> print(simple_seq_r.annotations["evidence"])
None. I just made it up.
\end{verbatim}

Working with per-letter-annotations is similar, \verb|letter_annotations| is a
dictionary like attribute which will let you assign any Python sequence (i.e.
a string, list or tuple) which has the same length as the sequence:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> simple_seq_r.letter_annotations["phred_quality"] = [40, 40, 38, 30]
>>> print(simple_seq_r.letter_annotations)
{'phred_quality': [40, 40, 38, 30]}
>>> print(simple_seq_r.letter_annotations["phred_quality"])
[40, 40, 38, 30]
\end{verbatim}

The \verb|dbxrefs| and \verb|features| attributes are just Python lists, and
should be used to store strings and \verb|SeqFeature| objects (discussed later
in this chapter) respectively.

%TODO - Update this to show passing in the annotations etc to __init__ ?

\subsection{SeqRecord objects from FASTA files}

This example uses a fairly large FASTA file containing the whole sequence for \textit{Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus} str. 91001 plasmid pPCP1, originally downloaded from the NCBI.  This file is included with the Biopython unit tests under the GenBank folder, or online \href{http://biopython.org/SRC/biopython/Tests/GenBank/NC_005816.fna}{\texttt{NC\_005816.fna}} from our website.

The file starts like this - and you can check there is only one record present (i.e. only one line starting with a greater than symbol):

\begin{verbatim}
>gi|45478711|ref|NC_005816.1| Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus ... pPCP1, complete sequence
TGTAACGAACGGTGCAATAGTGATCCACACCCAACGCCTGAAATCAGATCCAGGGGGTAATCTGCTCTCC
...
\end{verbatim}

Back in Chapter~\ref{chapter:quick-start} you will have seen the function \verb|Bio.SeqIO.parse(...)|
used to loop over all the records in a file as \verb|SeqRecord| objects. The \verb|Bio.SeqIO| module
has a sister function for use on files which contain just one record which we'll use here (see Chapter~\ref{chapter:Bio.SeqIO} for details):

%TODO - line wrapping for doctest?
\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio import SeqIO
>>> record = SeqIO.read("NC_005816.fna", "fasta")
>>> record
SeqRecord(seq=Seq('TGTAACGAACGGTGCAATAGTGATCCACACCCAACGCCTGAAATCAGATCCAGG...CTG',
SingleLetterAlphabet()), id='gi|45478711|ref|NC_005816.1|', name='gi|45478711|ref|NC_005816.1|',
description='gi|45478711|ref|NC_005816.1| Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus ... sequence',
dbxrefs=[])
\end{verbatim}

Now, let's have a look at the key attributes of this \verb|SeqRecord|
individually -- starting with the \verb|seq| attribute which gives you a
\verb|Seq| object:

\begin{verbatim}
>>> record.seq
Seq('TGTAACGAACGGTGCAATAGTGATCCACACCCAACGCCTGAAATCAGATCCAGG...CTG', SingleLetterAlphabet())
\end{verbatim}

\noindent Here \verb|Bio.SeqIO| has defaulted to a generic alphabet, rather
than guessing that this is DNA. If you know in advance what kind of sequence
your FASTA file contains, you can tell \verb|Bio.SeqIO| which alphabet to use
(see Chapter~\ref{chapter:Bio.SeqIO}).

Next, the identifiers and description:

\begin{verbatim}
>>> record.id
'gi|45478711|ref|NC_005816.1|'
>>> record.name
'gi|45478711|ref|NC_005816.1|'
>>> record.description
'gi|45478711|ref|NC_005816.1| Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus ... pPCP1, complete sequence'
\end{verbatim}

As you can see above, the first word of the FASTA record's title line (after
removing the greater than symbol) is used for both the \verb|id| and
\verb|name| attributes. The whole title line (after removing the greater than
symbol) is used for the record description. This is deliberate, partly for
backwards compatibility reasons, but it also makes sense if you have a FASTA
file like this:

\begin{verbatim}
>Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus str. 91001 plasmid pPCP1
TGTAACGAACGGTGCAATAGTGATCCACACCCAACGCCTGAAATCAGATCCAGGGGGTAATCTGCTCTCC
...
\end{verbatim}

Note that none of the other annotation attributes get populated when reading a
FASTA file:

\begin{verbatim}
>>> record.dbxrefs
[]
>>> record.annotations
{}
>>> record.letter_annotations
{}
>>> record.features
[]
\end{verbatim}

In this case our example FASTA file was from the NCBI, and they have a fairly well defined set of conventions for formatting their FASTA lines. This means it would be possible to parse this information and extract the GI number and accession for example. However, FASTA files from other sources vary, so this isn't possible in general.

\subsection{SeqRecord objects from GenBank files}

As in the previous example, we're going to look at the whole sequence for \textit{Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus} str. 91001 plasmid pPCP1, originally downloaded from the NCBI, but this time as a GenBank file.
Again, this file is included with the Biopython unit tests under the GenBank folder, or online \href{http://biopython.org/SRC/biopython/Tests/GenBank/NC_005816.gb}{\texttt{NC\_005816.gb}} from our website.

This file contains a single record (i.e. only one LOCUS line) and starts:
\begin{verbatim}
LOCUS       NC_005816               9609 bp    DNA     circular BCT 21-JUL-2008
DEFINITION  Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus str. 91001 plasmid pPCP1, complete
            sequence.
ACCESSION   NC_005816
VERSION     NC_005816.1  GI:45478711
PROJECT     GenomeProject:10638
...
\end{verbatim}

Again, we'll use \verb|Bio.SeqIO| to read this file in, and the code is almost identical to that for used above for the FASTA file (see Chapter~\ref{chapter:Bio.SeqIO} for details):

\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio import SeqIO
>>> record = SeqIO.read("NC_005816.gb", "genbank")
>>> record
SeqRecord(seq=Seq('TGTAACGAACGGTGCAATAGTGATCCACACCCAACGCCTGAAATCAGATCCAGG...CTG',
IUPACAmbiguousDNA()), id='NC_005816.1', name='NC_005816',
description='Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus str. 91001 plasmid pPCP1, complete sequence.',
dbxrefs=['Project:10638'])
\end{verbatim}

You should be able to spot some differences already! But taking the attributes individually,
the sequence string is the same as before, but this time \verb|Bio.SeqIO| has been able to automatically assign a more specific alphabet (see Chapter~\ref{chapter:Bio.SeqIO} for details):

\begin{verbatim}
>>> record.seq
Seq('TGTAACGAACGGTGCAATAGTGATCCACACCCAACGCCTGAAATCAGATCCAGG...CTG', IUPACAmbiguousDNA())
\end{verbatim}

The \verb|name| comes from the LOCUS line, while the \verb|id| includes the version suffix.
The description comes from the DEFINITION line:

\begin{verbatim}
>>> record.id
'NC_005816.1'
>>> record.name
'NC_005816'
>>> record.description
'Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus str. 91001 plasmid pPCP1, complete sequence.'
\end{verbatim}

GenBank files don't have any per-letter annotations:

\begin{verbatim}
>>> record.letter_annotations
{}
\end{verbatim}

Most of the annotations information gets recorded in the \verb|annotations| dictionary, for example:

\begin{verbatim}
>>> len(record.annotations)
11
>>> record.annotations["source"]
'Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus str. 91001'
\end{verbatim}

The \verb|dbxrefs| list gets populated from any PROJECT or DBLINK lines:

\begin{verbatim}
>>> record.dbxrefs
['Project:10638']
\end{verbatim}

Finally, and perhaps most interestingly, all the entries in the features table (e.g. the genes or CDS features) get recorded as \verb|SeqFeature| objects in the \verb|features| list.

\begin{verbatim}
>>> len(record.features)
29
\end{verbatim}

\noindent We'll talk about \verb|SeqFeature| objects next, in
Section~\ref{sec:seq_features}.

\section{Feature, location and position objects}
\label{sec:seq_features}

\subsection{SeqFeature objects}

Sequence features are an essential part of describing a sequence. Once you get beyond the sequence itself, you need some way to organize and easily get at the more ``abstract'' information that is known about the sequence. While it is probably impossible to develop a general sequence feature class that will cover everything, the Biopython \verb|SeqFeature| class attempts to encapsulate as much of the information about the sequence as possible. The design is heavily based on the GenBank/EMBL feature tables, so if you understand how they look, you'll probably have an easier time grasping the structure of the Biopython classes.

The key idea about each \verb|SeqFeature| object is to describe a region on a parent sequence, typically a \verb|SeqRecord| object. That region is described with a location object, typically a range between two positions (see Section~\ref{sec:locations} below).

The \verb|SeqFeature| class has a number of attributes, so first we'll list them and their general features, and then later in the chapter work through examples to show how this applies to a real life example. The attributes of a SeqFeature are:

\begin{description}
  \item[.type] -- This is a textual description of the type of feature (for instance, this will be something like `CDS' or `gene').

  \item[.location] -- The location of the \verb|SeqFeature| on the sequence
  that you are dealing with, see Section~\ref{sec:locations} below. The
  \verb|SeqFeature| delegates much of its functionality to the location
  object, and includes a number of shortcut attributes for properties
  of the location:

  \begin{description}
    \item[.ref] -- shorthand for \verb|.location.ref| -- any (different)
    reference sequence the location is referring to. Usually just None.

    \item[.ref\_db] -- shorthand for \verb|.location.ref_db| -- specifies
    the database any identifier in \verb|.ref| refers to. Usually just None.

    \item[.strand] -- shorthand for \verb|.location.strand| -- the strand on
    the sequence that the feature is located on. For double stranded nucleotide
    sequence this may either be $1$ for the top strand, $-1$ for the bottom
    strand, $0$ if the strand is important but is unknown, or \texttt{None}
    if it doesn't matter. This is None for proteins, or single stranded sequences.
  \end{description}

  \item[.qualifiers] -- This is a Python dictionary of additional information about the feature. The key is some kind of terse one-word description of what the information contained in the value is about, and the value is the actual information. For example, a common key for a qualifier might be ``evidence'' and the value might be ``computational (non-experimental).'' This is just a way to let the person who is looking at the feature know that it has not be experimentally (i.~e.~in a wet lab) confirmed. Note that other the value will be a list of strings (even when there is only one string). This is a reflection of the feature tables in GenBank/EMBL files.

  \item[.sub\_features] -- This used to be used to represent features with complicated locations like `joins' in GenBank/EMBL files. This has been deprecated with the introduction of the \verb|CompoundLocation| object, and should now be ignored.

\end{description}

\subsection{Positions and locations}
\label{sec:locations}

The key idea about each \verb|SeqFeature| object is to describe a
region on a parent sequence, for which we use a location object,
typically describing a range between two positions. Two try to
clarify the terminology we're using:

\begin{description}
  \item[position] -- This refers to a single position on a sequence,
  which may be fuzzy or not. For instance, 5, 20, \verb|<100| and
  \verb|>200| are all positions.

  \item[location] -- A location is region of sequence bounded by
  some positions. For instance 5..20 (i.~e.~5 to 20) is a location.
\end{description}

I just mention this because sometimes I get confused between the two.

\subsubsection{FeatureLocation object}

Unless you work with eukaryotic genes, most \verb|SeqFeature| locations are
extremely simple - you just need start and end coordinates and a strand.
That's essentially all the basic \verb|FeatureLocation| object does.

%TODO -- add example here

In practise of course, things can be more complicated. First of all
we have to handle compound locations made up of several regions.
Secondly, the positions themselves may be fuzzy (inexact).

\subsubsection{CompoundLocation object}

Biopython 1.62 introduced the \verb|CompoundLocation| as part of
a restructuring of how complex locations made up of multiple regions
are represented.
The main usage is for handling `join' locations in EMBL/GenBank files.

%TODO -- add example here

\subsubsection{Fuzzy Positions}

So far we've only used simple positions. One complication in dealing
with feature locations comes in the positions themselves.
In biology many times things aren't entirely certain
(as much as us wet lab biologists try to make them certain!). For
instance, you might do a dinucleotide priming experiment and discover
that the start of mRNA transcript starts at one of two sites. This
is very useful information, but the complication comes in how to
represent this as a position. To help us deal with this, we have
the concept of fuzzy positions. Basically there are several types
of fuzzy positions, so we have five classes do deal with them:

\begin{description}
  \item[ExactPosition] -- As its name suggests, this class represents a position which is specified as exact along the sequence. This is represented as just a number, and you can get the position by looking at the \verb|position| attribute of the object.

  \item[BeforePosition] -- This class represents a fuzzy position
  that occurs prior to some specified site. In GenBank/EMBL notation,
  this is represented as something like \verb|`<13'|, signifying that
  the real position is located somewhere less than 13. To get
  the specified upper boundary, look at the \verb|position|
  attribute of the object.

  \item[AfterPosition] -- Contrary to \verb|BeforePosition|, this
  class represents a position that occurs after some specified site.
  This is represented in GenBank as \verb|`>13'|, and like
  \verb|BeforePosition|, you get the boundary number by looking
  at the \verb|position| attribute of the object.

  \item[WithinPosition] -- Occasionally used for GenBank/EMBL locations,
  this class models a position which occurs somewhere between two
  specified nucleotides. In GenBank/EMBL notation, this would be
  represented as `(1.5)', to represent that the position is somewhere
  within the range 1 to 5. To get the information in this class you
  have to look at two attributes. The \verb|position| attribute
  specifies the lower boundary of the range we are looking at, so in
  our example case this would be one. The \verb|extension| attribute
  specifies the range to the higher boundary, so in this case it
  would be 4. So \verb|object.position| is the lower boundary and
  \verb|object.position + object.extension| is the upper boundary.

  \item[OneOfPosition] -- Occasionally used for GenBank/EMBL locations,
  this class deals with a position where several possible values exist,
  for instance you could use this if the start codon was unclear and
  there where two candidates for the start of the gene. Alternatively,
  that might be handled explicitly as two related gene features.

  \item[UnknownPosition] -- This class deals with a position of unknown
  location. This is not used in GenBank/EMBL, but corresponds to the `?'
  feature coordinate used in UniProt.

\end{description}

Here's an example where we create a location with fuzzy end points:

%doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio import SeqFeature
>>> start_pos = SeqFeature.AfterPosition(5)
>>> end_pos = SeqFeature.BetweenPosition(9, left=8, right=9)
>>> my_location = SeqFeature.FeatureLocation(start_pos, end_pos)
\end{verbatim}

Note that the details of some of the fuzzy-locations changed in Biopython 1.59,
in particular for BetweenPosition and WithinPosition you must now make it explicit
which integer position should be used for slicing etc. For a start position this
is generally the lower (left) value, while for an end position this would generally
be the higher (right) value.

If you print out a \verb|FeatureLocation| object, you can get a nice representation of the information:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> print(my_location)
[>5:(8^9)]
\end{verbatim}

We can access the fuzzy start and end positions using the start and end attributes of the location:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> my_location.start
AfterPosition(5)
>>> print(my_location.start)
>5
>>> my_location.end
BetweenPosition(9, left=8, right=9)
>>> print(my_location.end)
(8^9)
\end{verbatim}

If you don't want to deal with fuzzy positions and just want numbers,
they are actually subclasses of integers so should work like integers:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> int(my_location.start)
5
>>> int(my_location.end)
9
\end{verbatim}

For compatibility with older versions of Biopython you can ask for the
\verb|nofuzzy_start| and \verb|nofuzzy_end| attributes of the location
which are plain integers:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> my_location.nofuzzy_start
5
>>> my_location.nofuzzy_end
9
\end{verbatim}

Notice that this just gives you back the position attributes of the fuzzy locations.

Similarly, to make it easy to create a position without worrying about fuzzy positions, you can just pass in numbers to the \verb|FeaturePosition| constructors, and you'll get back out \verb|ExactPosition| objects:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> exact_location = SeqFeature.FeatureLocation(5, 9)
>>> print(exact_location)
[5:9]
>>> exact_location.start
ExactPosition(5)
>>> int(exact_location.start)
5
>>> exact_location.nofuzzy_start
5
\end{verbatim}

That is most of the nitty gritty about dealing with fuzzy positions in Biopython.
It has been designed so that dealing with fuzziness is not that much more
complicated than dealing with exact positions, and hopefully you find that true!

\subsubsection{Location testing}

You can use the Python keyword \verb|in| with a \verb|SeqFeature| or location
object to see if the base/residue for a parent coordinate is within the
feature/location or not.

For example, suppose you have a SNP of interest and you want to know which
features this SNP is within, and lets suppose this SNP is at index 4350
(Python counting!). Here is a simple brute force solution where we just
check all the features one by one in a loop:

%doctest ../Tests/GenBank
\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio import SeqIO
>>> my_snp = 4350
>>> record = SeqIO.read("NC_005816.gb", "genbank")
>>> for feature in record.features:
...     if my_snp in feature:
...         print("%s %s" % (feature.type, feature.qualifiers.get('db_xref')))
...
source ['taxon:229193']
gene ['GeneID:2767712']
CDS ['GI:45478716', 'GeneID:2767712']
\end{verbatim}

Note that gene and CDS features from GenBank or EMBL files defined with joins
are the union of the exons -- they do not cover any introns.

%TODO - Add join example

\subsection{Sequence described by a feature or location}

A \verb|SeqFeature| or location object doesn't directly contain a sequence, instead the location (see Section~\ref{sec:locations}) describes how to get this from the parent sequence. For example consider a (short) gene sequence with location 5:18 on the reverse strand, which in GenBank/EMBL notation using 1-based counting would be \texttt{complement(6..18)}, like this:

%doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio.Seq import Seq
>>> from Bio.SeqFeature import SeqFeature, FeatureLocation
>>> example_parent = Seq("ACCGAGACGGCAAAGGCTAGCATAGGTATGAGACTTCCTTCCTGCCAGTGCTGAGGAACTGGGAGCCTAC")
>>> example_feature = SeqFeature(FeatureLocation(5, 18), type="gene", strand=-1)
\end{verbatim}

You could take the parent sequence, slice it to extract 5:18, and then take the reverse complement.
If you are using Biopython 1.59 or later, the feature location's start and end are integer like so this works:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> feature_seq = example_parent[example_feature.location.start:example_feature.location.end].reverse_complement()
>>> print(feature_seq)
AGCCTTTGCCGTC
\end{verbatim}

This is a simple example so this isn't too bad -- however once you have to deal with compound features (joins) this is rather messy. Instead, the \verb|SeqFeature| object has an \verb|extract| method to take care of all this:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> feature_seq = example_feature.extract(example_parent)
>>> print(feature_seq)
AGCCTTTGCCGTC
\end{verbatim}

The length of a \verb|SeqFeature| or location matches
that of the region of sequence it describes.

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> print(example_feature.extract(example_parent))
AGCCTTTGCCGTC
>>> print(len(example_feature.extract(example_parent)))
13
>>> print(len(example_feature))
13
>>> print(len(example_feature.location))
13
\end{verbatim}

For simple \verb|FeatureLocation| objects the length is just
the difference between the start and end positions. However,
for a \verb|CompoundLocation| the length is the sum of the
constituent regions.

\section{Comparison}

The \verb|SeqRecord| objects can be very complex, but here's a simple example:

%doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio.Seq import Seq
>>> from Bio.SeqRecord import SeqRecord
>>> record1 = SeqRecord(Seq("ACGT"), id="test")
>>> record2 = SeqRecord(Seq("ACGT"), id="test")
\end{verbatim}

What happens when you try to compare these ``identical'' records?

%this is not a doctest:
\begin{verbatim}
>>> record1 == record2
...
\end{verbatim}

Perhaps surprisingly older versions of Biopython would use Python's default object
comparison for the \verb|SeqRecord|, meaning \verb|record1 == record2| would
only return \verb|True| if these variables pointed at the same object in memory.
In this example, \verb|record1 == record2| would have returned \verb|False|
here!

%this is not a doctest:
\begin{verbatim}
>>> record1 == record2  # on old versions of Biopython!
False
\end{verbatim}

As of Biopython 1.67, \verb|SeqRecord| comparison like \verb|record1 == record2|
will instead raise an explicit error to avoid people being caught out by this:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> record1 == record2
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NotImplementedError: SeqRecord comparison is deliberately not implemented. Explicitly compare the attributes of interest.
\end{verbatim}

Instead you should check the attributes you are interested in, for example the
identifier and the sequence:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> record1.id == record2.id
True
>>> record1.seq == record2.seq
True
\end{verbatim}

Beware that comparing complex objects quickly gets complicated (see also
Section~\ref{sec:seq-comparison}).

\section{References}

Another common annotation related to a sequence is a reference to a journal or other published work dealing with the sequence. We have a fairly simple way of representing a Reference in Biopython -- we have a \verb|Bio.SeqFeature.Reference| class that stores the relevant information about a reference as attributes of an object.

The attributes include things that you would expect to see in a reference like \verb|journal|, \verb|title| and \verb|authors|. Additionally, it also can hold the \verb|medline_id| and \verb|pubmed_id| and a \verb|comment| about the reference. These are all accessed simply as attributes of the object.

A reference also has a \verb|location| object so that it can specify a particular location on the sequence that the reference refers to. For instance, you might have a journal that is dealing with a particular gene located on a BAC, and want to specify that it only refers to this position exactly. The \verb|location| is a potentially fuzzy location, as described in section~\ref{sec:locations}.

Any reference objects are stored as a list in the \verb|SeqRecord| object's \verb|annotations| dictionary under the key ``references''.
That's all there is too it. References are meant to be easy to deal with, and hopefully general enough to cover lots of usage cases.

\section{The format method}
\label{sec:SeqRecord-format}

The \verb|format()| method of the \verb|SeqRecord| class gives a string
containing your record formatted using one of the output file formats
supported by \verb|Bio.SeqIO|, such as FASTA:

\begin{verbatim}
from Bio.Seq import Seq
from Bio.SeqRecord import SeqRecord
from Bio.Alphabet import generic_protein

record = SeqRecord(Seq("MMYQQGCFAGGTVLRLAKDLAENNRGARVLVVCSEITAVTFRGPSETHLDSMVGQALFGD" \
                      +"GAGAVIVGSDPDLSVERPLYELVWTGATLLPDSEGAIDGHLREVGLTFHLLKDVPGLISK" \
                      +"NIEKSLKEAFTPLGISDWNSTFWIAHPGGPAILDQVEAKLGLKEEKMRATREVLSEYGNM" \
                      +"SSAC", generic_protein),
                   id="gi|14150838|gb|AAK54648.1|AF376133_1",
                   description="chalcone synthase [Cucumis sativus]")

print(record.format("fasta"))
\end{verbatim}
\noindent which should give:
\begin{verbatim}
>gi|14150838|gb|AAK54648.1|AF376133_1 chalcone synthase [Cucumis sativus]
MMYQQGCFAGGTVLRLAKDLAENNRGARVLVVCSEITAVTFRGPSETHLDSMVGQALFGD
GAGAVIVGSDPDLSVERPLYELVWTGATLLPDSEGAIDGHLREVGLTFHLLKDVPGLISK
NIEKSLKEAFTPLGISDWNSTFWIAHPGGPAILDQVEAKLGLKEEKMRATREVLSEYGNM
SSAC
\end{verbatim}

This \verb|format| method takes a single mandatory argument, a lower case string which is
supported by \verb|Bio.SeqIO| as an output format (see Chapter~\ref{chapter:Bio.SeqIO}).
However, some of the file formats \verb|Bio.SeqIO| can write to \emph{require} more than
one record (typically the case for multiple sequence alignment formats), and thus won't
work via this \verb|format()| method.  See also Section~\ref{sec:Bio.SeqIO-and-StringIO}.

\section{Slicing a SeqRecord}
\label{sec:SeqRecord-slicing}

You can slice a \verb|SeqRecord|, to give you a new \verb|SeqRecord| covering just
part of the sequence. What is important
here is that any per-letter annotations are also sliced, and any features which fall
completely within the new sequence are preserved (with their locations adjusted).

For example, taking the same GenBank file used earlier:

%doctest ../Tests/GenBank
\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio import SeqIO
>>> record = SeqIO.read("NC_005816.gb", "genbank")
\end{verbatim}
%TODO - support line wrapping in doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> record
SeqRecord(seq=Seq('TGTAACGAACGGTGCAATAGTGATCCACACCCAACGCCTGAAATCAGATCCAGG...CTG',
IUPACAmbiguousDNA()), id='NC_005816.1', name='NC_005816',
description='Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus str. 91001 plasmid pPCP1, complete sequence.',
dbxrefs=['Project:10638'])
\end{verbatim}
%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> len(record)
9609
>>> len(record.features)
41
\end{verbatim}


For this example we're going to focus in on the \verb|pim| gene, \verb|YP_pPCP05|.
If you have a look at the GenBank file directly you'll find this gene/CDS has
location string \texttt{4343..4780}, or in Python counting \texttt{4342:4780}.
From looking at the file you can work out that these are the twelfth and
thirteenth entries in the file, so in Python zero-based counting they are
entries $11$ and $12$ in the \texttt{features} list:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> print(record.features[20])
type: gene
location: [4342:4780](+)
qualifiers:
    Key: db_xref, Value: ['GeneID:2767712']
    Key: gene, Value: ['pim']
    Key: locus_tag, Value: ['YP_pPCP05']
<BLANKLINE>
\end{verbatim}
%This one is truncated so can't use for doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> print(record.features[21])
type: CDS
location: [4342:4780](+)
qualifiers:
    Key: codon_start, Value: ['1']
    Key: db_xref, Value: ['GI:45478716', 'GeneID:2767712']
    Key: gene, Value: ['pim']
    Key: locus_tag, Value: ['YP_pPCP05']
    Key: note, Value: ['similar to many previously sequenced pesticin immunity ...']
    Key: product, Value: ['pesticin immunity protein']
    Key: protein_id, Value: ['NP_995571.1']
    Key: transl_table, Value: ['11']
    Key: translation, Value: ['MGGGMISKLFCLALIFLSSSGLAEKNTYTAKDILQNLELNTFGNSLSH...']
\end{verbatim}

Let's slice this parent record from 4300 to 4800 (enough to include the \verb|pim|
gene/CDS), and see how many features we get:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> sub_record = record[4300:4800]
\end{verbatim}
%TODO - Line wrapping for doctest?
\begin{verbatim}
>>> sub_record
SeqRecord(seq=Seq('ATAAATAGATTATTCCAAATAATTTATTTATGTAAGAACAGGATGGGAGGGGGA...TTA',
IUPACAmbiguousDNA()), id='NC_005816.1', name='NC_005816',
description='Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus str. 91001 plasmid pPCP1, complete sequence.',
dbxrefs=[])
\end{verbatim}
%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> len(sub_record)
500
>>> len(sub_record.features)
2
\end{verbatim}

Our sub-record just has two features, the gene and CDS entries for \verb|YP_pPCP05|:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> print(sub_record.features[0])
type: gene
location: [42:480](+)
qualifiers:
    Key: db_xref, Value: ['GeneID:2767712']
    Key: gene, Value: ['pim']
    Key: locus_tag, Value: ['YP_pPCP05']
<BLANKLINE>
\end{verbatim}
%As above, output is truncated so cannot test this as a doctest:
\begin{verbatim}
>>> print(sub_record.features[1])
type: CDS
location: [42:480](+)
qualifiers:
    Key: codon_start, Value: ['1']
    Key: db_xref, Value: ['GI:45478716', 'GeneID:2767712']
    Key: gene, Value: ['pim']
    Key: locus_tag, Value: ['YP_pPCP05']
    Key: note, Value: ['similar to many previously sequenced pesticin immunity ...']
    Key: product, Value: ['pesticin immunity protein']
    Key: protein_id, Value: ['NP_995571.1']
    Key: transl_table, Value: ['11']
    Key: translation, Value: ['MGGGMISKLFCLALIFLSSSGLAEKNTYTAKDILQNLELNTFGNSLSH...']
\end{verbatim}

\noindent Notice that their locations have been adjusted to reflect the new parent sequence!

While Biopython has done something sensible and hopefully intuitive with the features
(and any per-letter annotation), for the other annotation it is impossible to know if
this still applies to the sub-sequence or not. To avoid guessing, the \texttt{annotations}
and \texttt{dbxrefs} are omitted from the sub-record, and it is up to you to transfer
any relevant information as appropriate.

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> sub_record.annotations
{}
>>> sub_record.dbxrefs
[]
\end{verbatim}

The same point could be made about the record \texttt{id}, \texttt{name}
and \texttt{description}, but for practicality these are preserved:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> sub_record.id
'NC_005816.1'
>>> sub_record.name
'NC_005816'
>>> sub_record.description
'Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus str. 91001 plasmid pPCP1, complete sequence.'
\end{verbatim}

\noindent This illustrates the problem nicely though, our new sub-record is
\emph{not} the complete sequence of the plasmid, so the description is wrong!
Let's fix this and then view the sub-record as a reduced GenBank file using
the \texttt{format} method described above in Section~\ref{sec:SeqRecord-format}:

\begin{verbatim}
>>> sub_record.description = "Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus str. 91001 plasmid pPCP1, partial."
>>> print(sub_record.format("genbank"))
...
\end{verbatim}

See Sections~\ref{sec:FASTQ-slicing-off-primer}
and~\ref{sec:FASTQ-slicing-off-adaptor} for some FASTQ examples where the
per-letter annotations (the read quality scores) are also sliced.

\section{Adding SeqRecord objects}
\label{sec:SeqRecord-addition}

You can add \verb|SeqRecord| objects together, giving a new \verb|SeqRecord|.
What is important here is that any common
per-letter annotations are also added, all the features are preserved (with their
locations adjusted), and any other common annotation is also kept (like the id, name
and description).

For an example with per-letter annotation, we'll use the first record in a
FASTQ file. Chapter~\ref{chapter:Bio.SeqIO} will explain the \verb|SeqIO| functions:

%doctest ../Tests/Quality
\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio import SeqIO
>>> record = next(SeqIO.parse("example.fastq", "fastq"))
>>> len(record)
25
>>> print(record.seq)
CCCTTCTTGTCTTCAGCGTTTCTCC
\end{verbatim}
%TODO - doctest wrapping
\begin{verbatim}
>>> print(record.letter_annotations["phred_quality"])
[26, 26, 18, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 22, 26, 26, 26, 26,
26, 26, 26, 23, 23]
\end{verbatim}

\noindent Let's suppose this was Roche 454 data, and that from other information
you think the \texttt{TTT} should be only \texttt{TT}. We can make a new edited
record by first slicing the \verb|SeqRecord| before and after the ``extra''
third \texttt{T}:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> left = record[:20]
>>> print(left.seq)
CCCTTCTTGTCTTCAGCGTT
>>> print(left.letter_annotations["phred_quality"])
[26, 26, 18, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 22, 26, 26, 26, 26]
>>> right = record[21:]
>>> print(right.seq)
CTCC
>>> print(right.letter_annotations["phred_quality"])
[26, 26, 23, 23]
\end{verbatim}

\noindent Now add the two parts together:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> edited = left + right
>>> len(edited)
24
>>> print(edited.seq)
CCCTTCTTGTCTTCAGCGTTCTCC
\end{verbatim}
\begin{verbatim}
>>> print(edited.letter_annotations["phred_quality"])
[26, 26, 18, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 22, 26, 26, 26, 26,
26, 26, 23, 23]
\end{verbatim}

\noindent Easy and intuitive? We hope so! You can make this shorter with just:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> edited = record[:20] + record[21:]
\end{verbatim}

Now, for an example with features, we'll use a GenBank file.
Suppose you have a circular genome:

%doctest ../Tests/GenBank
\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio import SeqIO
>>> record = SeqIO.read("NC_005816.gb", "genbank")
\end{verbatim}
%TODO - doctest wrapping
\begin{verbatim}
>>> record
SeqRecord(seq=Seq('TGTAACGAACGGTGCAATAGTGATCCACACCCAACGCCTGAAATCAGATCCAGG...CTG',
IUPACAmbiguousDNA()), id='NC_005816.1', name='NC_005816',
description='Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus str. 91001 plasmid pPCP1, complete sequence.',
dbxrefs=['Project:10638'])
\end{verbatim}
%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> len(record)
9609
>>> len(record.features)
41
>>> record.dbxrefs
['Project:58037']
\end{verbatim}
%TODO - doctest wrapping
\begin{verbatim}
>>> record.annotations.keys()
['comment', 'sequence_version', 'source', 'taxonomy', 'keywords', 'references',
'accessions', 'data_file_division', 'date', 'organism', 'gi']
\end{verbatim}

You can shift the origin like this:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> shifted = record[2000:] + record[:2000]
\end{verbatim}
%TODO - doctest wrapping
\begin{verbatim}
>>> shifted
SeqRecord(seq=Seq('GATACGCAGTCATATTTTTTACACAATTCTCTAATCCCGACAAGGTCGTAGGTC...GGA',
IUPACAmbiguousDNA()), id='NC_005816.1', name='NC_005816',
description='Yersinia pestis biovar Microtus str. 91001 plasmid pPCP1, complete sequence.',
dbxrefs=[])
\end{verbatim}
%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> len(shifted)
9609
\end{verbatim}

Note that this isn't perfect in that some annotation like the database cross references
and one of the features (the source feature) have been lost:

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> len(shifted.features)
40
>>> shifted.dbxrefs
[]
>>> shifted.annotations.keys()
[]
\end{verbatim}

This is because the \verb|SeqRecord| slicing step is cautious in what annotation
it preserves (erroneously propagating annotation can cause major problems). If
you want to keep the database cross references or the annotations dictionary,
this must be done explicitly:

\begin{verbatim}
>>> shifted.dbxrefs = record.dbxrefs[:]
>>> shifted.annotations = record.annotations.copy()
>>> shifted.dbxrefs
['Project:10638']
>>> shifted.annotations.keys()
['comment', 'sequence_version', 'source', 'taxonomy', 'keywords', 'references',
'accessions', 'data_file_division', 'date', 'organism', 'gi']
\end{verbatim}

Also note that in an example like this, you should probably change the record
identifiers since the NCBI references refer to the \emph{original} unmodified
sequence.

\section{Reverse-complementing SeqRecord objects}
\label{sec:SeqRecord-reverse-complement}

One of the new features in Biopython 1.57 was the \verb|SeqRecord| object's
\verb|reverse_complement| method. This tries to balance easy of use with worries
about what to do with the annotation in the reverse complemented record.

For the sequence, this uses the Seq object's reverse complement method. Any
features are transferred with the location and strand recalculated. Likewise
any per-letter-annotation is also copied but reversed (which makes sense for
typical examples like quality scores). However, transfer of most annotation
is problematical.

For instance, if the record ID was an accession, that accession should not really
apply to the reverse complemented sequence, and transferring the identifier by
default could easily cause subtle data corruption in downstream analysis.
Therefore by default, the \verb|SeqRecord|'s id, name, description, annotations
and database cross references are all \emph{not} transferred by default.

The \verb|SeqRecord| object's \verb|reverse_complement| method takes a number
of optional arguments corresponding to properties of the record. Setting these
arguments to \verb|True| means copy the old values, while \verb|False| means
drop the old values and use the default value. You can alternatively provide
the new desired value instead.

Consider this example record:

%doctest ../Tests/GenBank
\begin{verbatim}
>>> from Bio import SeqIO
>>> record = SeqIO.read("NC_005816.gb", "genbank")
>>> print("%s %i %i %i %i" % (record.id, len(record), len(record.features), len(record.dbxrefs), len(record.annotations)))
NC_005816.1 9609 41 1 12
\end{verbatim}

Here we take the reverse complement and specify a new identifier -- but notice
how most of the annotation is dropped (but not the features):

%cont-doctest
\begin{verbatim}
>>> rc = record.reverse_complement(id="TESTING")
>>> print("%s %i %i %i %i" % (rc.id, len(rc), len(rc.features), len(rc.dbxrefs), len(rc.annotations)))
TESTING 9609 41 0 0
\end{verbatim}

