Prime Counting:

What have we got:


Riemann noticed that he could approximate the prime counting function by a term by term accumulation of basis functions. The prime counting function  will be the sum of tones of slightly more complicated waves than sinusoids.

Ultimately at some infinitely distant point the simultaneous construction gives a perfect replication of the prime distribution function, and hence the prime counting function.


 

      
                                                                                          



Do these ever cross?      Yes

Before Skewe's number 10^10^10^34

For larger N, Gauss's estimate was initially
thought to underestimate the real
number of primes.

 










 

Obviously these figures were bootlegged from various sources.



Here is something interesting about zeros of complex functions. If you find web sites showing the calculation of zeros of the Zeta function they tend to look like this. Z(t) is a cousin of Zeta(s) with zeros along the critical line

This is a bit confusing because it is not clear that there would not be zeros just off the critial line.


Aside: The formula to calculate Z(t) was discovered by Riemann and rediscovered by Siegel and published in the 1930s O(t1/2).
Prior Z(t) utilized a method denoted Euler-Maclaurin which is similar to that used by Ramanujan O(t).

When looking at zeros of a complex function of a complex of a complex variable, both real and imaginary parts simultaneously are required to be zero.


Density of the Zeros

Riemann conjectured that the density of Zeta zeros was approximately log(T/2
p)

Reciprocal to the density of Primes!

The zeros are getting closer togther as one one heads up the critical line, real part =1/2. Reimann had already proved the non trivial zeros were confined to the critical strip.

 

back  continuenotfunny